This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gateman1997 (talk | contribs) at 22:44, 17 August 2005 (→Something which may interest editors of this page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:44, 17 August 2005 by Gateman1997 (talk | contribs) (→Something which may interest editors of this page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Something which may interest editors of this page
Template:DecencyWikiProject Any help which could be provided would be greatly appreciated. -Godfearing Parent.
- I'm failing to see how this violates any sense of decency? It's an article about a notable porn star and there are no "obscene" or "pornographic" pictures on the article page. If no one responds in 5 days I'll delete this POV tag. Gateman1997 22:12, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not a fan of this so-called Decency project, but I do think it would be better to have a picture of Pandora Peaks that doesn't have her hand down her pants.--Prosfilaes 22:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Frankly I don't see how it matters. (I agree there might be better shots of her out there, but that's beside the point). This tag is used to identify obscene articles. This article is neither obscene nor offensive unless your a raging right winger with a "Jesus Saves" bumpersticker. (Please note that she is fully clothed in the pic.)Gateman1997 22:44, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not a fan of this so-called Decency project, but I do think it would be better to have a picture of Pandora Peaks that doesn't have her hand down her pants.--Prosfilaes 22:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)