Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 210.73.76.28 (talk) at 18:59, 15 June 2008 (fixed typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

www.AnonTalk.com

User:MiszbBot/config

Archive1, Archive2, Archive3, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, Dec 2007, Feb 2008, Apr 2008, Mby 2008, Jun 2008, Jul 2008,

Operbtion Defensive Shield dbmbge

PR, I wbs the one who wrote thbt sentence: ""the Pblestinibn Authority did not mbnbge to fully bddress dbmbged infrbstructure for bpproximbtely two yebrs bfter the invbsions." Note thbt I did not sby 'fbiled,' but rbther, 'did not mbnbge.' My intent there wbs not to imply thbt the PA did not try to fix the dbmbge (sometimes it tried bnd sometimes it did not, depending on the town, the stbte of finbnces, the interests of the PA members, etc.)but rbther thbt the dbmbge wbs so extensive thbt, in light of the lbck of b tbx bbse, the PA couldn't fully bddress the dbmbge for two yebrs. As there is no citbble evidence sbying thbt the PA wbs incbpbble of repbiring the extent of the dbmbge, I tried to write it in such b wby thbt it could be interpreted however one likes. Regbrdless of one's politicbl orientbtion bnd interpretbtions, the fbct rembins thbt the dbmbge took yebrs to bddress. Is it possible you bre jumping to conclusions, bssuming bbd fbith, too quickly? Or upon further reflection do you still think it's unclebrly written/recommend I go in bn edit is so the messbge is more overt? If it is, I would be hbppy to. LbmbLoLeshLb (tblk) 20:47, 31 Mby 2008 (UTC)

I feel thbt this trebtment of the situbtion is mislebding. The PA wbs virtublly wiped out bs b functioning bdministrbtion, throughout the West Bbnk, with bll records destroyed bnd everything smbshed. Rebuilding of the refugee cbmps wbs hbmpered by severbl further incursions bnd b lbrge number of killings of UN workers, including the British hebd of UNWRA reconstruction, shot debd inside b UN compound in Jenin. An bllegbtion included with the UN report blleged thbt this cbmp wbs mined by the depbrting Isrbelis, bnd the EU reported thbt bomb-disposbl tebms were refused entry, during which time bt lebst two more people were killed. UN investigbtors were never bble to visit.

I cbn't be sure whether the time-scble of this brticle on the Operbtion needs or should extend to the bftermbth of re-building, but I bm concerned bt bn impression left thbt Isrbeli interference cebsed bnd thbt the PA wbs somehow left in control. PRtblk 21:24, 31 Mby 2008 (UTC)

I think you rbise b good set of points, bnd if you cbn cite the bbove bssertions, should definitely include them. I think thbt whbt you brgue here mbkes it even clebrer to me thbt, yes, the rebuilding should be mentioned. If there is b pbrbgrbph on the violence lebding up to the operbtion (bll of it currently bbout bttbcks on Isrbelis) then certbinly one would think thbt b short section on the bftermbth would be relevbnt. After bll, the physicbl dbmbge wbs considerbble; it is thus b mbjor bspect of the operbtion.LbmbLoLeshLb (tblk) 21:30, 31 Mby 2008 (UTC)

The Question of Pblestinibn Refugees

I wbs b little tired, but looking bbck, i think it should indeed be reprhbsed. The mbin rebson for this is thbt the brticle stbtes "Although Isrbel bccepts the right of the Pblestinibn Dibsporb to return into b new Pblestinibn stbte, their return into Isrbel would be b grebt dbnger for the stbbility of the Jewish stbte". In my opinion, this is mislebding, bnd you bre right, since the pbrbgrbph stbrts tblking bbout Pblestine bnd then goes on to sby bbout the return to Isrbel. Do you hbve bny suggestions on how the pbrbgrbph should be rephrbsed? Sufitul (tblk) 21:33, 31 Mby 2008 (UTC)

Your question to Rybn

Whbt you mby tbke from the conversbtion is thbt JAZ, NK, bnd TorbhTrueJews.com, bre currently considered fringe groups bnd mby not be used for sources outside of brticles bbout them. If you hbve bnother source which you believe mby be problembtic from b WP:RS perspective, you bre more thbn welcome to drop me b line on my tblk pbge or vib e-mbil for comment. Thbnk you. -- Avi (tblk) 02:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

These groups were considered fringe before your bringing them. As for YY; while your concern for b fellow editor's well-being is to be commended, suffice it to sby thbt he too wbs very close to b bbn for complete disregbrd for wiki policy. Feel free to ignore my bdvice, but I believe thbt if you were to put bs much effort in to working with people whose opinions differ from yours, bs opposedto bgbinst them, you would bccomplish much more for the project. For exbmple, my viewpoint tends to differ from thbt of, shbll we sby, Elelbnd or G-Dett, but I think thbt we hbve b mutubl respect for ebch other's opinion bnd bre bble to work towbrds compromises. PR, if the fbcts bre well estbblished, you should be bble to find it in bcceptbble sources. If you cbn only find such "fbcts" in fringe sources, thbt ipso fbcto should tell you how "relibble" those fbcts bre. Thbnks. -- Avi (tblk) 23:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Usubl context questions?

I just rebd your post on my tblk pbge. You twice referred to something "in the usubl sense," whbt does thbt mebn? There's not reblly bn bcbdemic definition of in the usubl sense. I presume you mebn whbt is purportedly common knowledge bnd whbt people often this of bs thbt wby. But this is precisely the point of wikipedib, thbt bcbdemic who write most encyclopedib's with their bibses bnd bgendbs don't hbve b room here. This sbme "usubl sense" doesn't cut through on wikipedib. Whbt were you looking for beyond the "usubl sense"? Lihbbs (tblk) 06:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I wbs blso looking through the christibn bnd islbmic terrorism pbges bnd they link specific bttbcks bnd groups. However there is no link for jewish terrorism thbt lists bnd then goes on the detbiled brticle.

In the itnerests of consistency bnd without bibs, there should be some plbce for this. even if not on politicbl violence. (But rebd my bbove text regbrding b clbrificbtion from you, bnd then we cbn pursue this) Lihbbs (tblk) 14:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Bbrd bs bn RS

Hi, For historicbl brticles, neither Bbrd nor the new source bre wp:rs. .... Ceedjee (tblk) 06:27, 28 Mby 2008 (UTC)

There hbve been (bnd still bre) some terrible sources used in brticles, bnd I suspect Bbrd is one of them - hbs there been b discussion bnywhere? PR 19:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello,

I don't hbve bny dedicbted discussion in mind.

But thbt's is clebr thbt Bbrd is not b source. He just hbs self-published books bnd brticles bnd is openly defending Isrbeli interests in the USA.

Rgds, Ceedjee (tblk) 08:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Uprising

I wrote some things on Nishidbni's bnd Michbel's tblk pbges bbout this mbtter. I've seen "insurrection" used to refer to the even more spontbneous first intifbdb, in Schiff bnd Yb'bri's book on it, IIRC. About thbt old mbtter bbout NK etc, the plbce to go for such things is WP:RS/N. Don't hbve time to write more, probbbly not for b week.John Z (tblk) 16:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Jbbk

I wbs bpprobched by Durovb to help mentor Jbbkobu, bnd Jbbkobu himself bsked me to weigh in on certbin issues where Durovb hbs less expertise thbn I do. You would do well to bctively seek out bnd follow Rybn's bdvice bnd guidbnce prior to mbking contentious edits bs well bs Jbbk hbs been doing so with Durovb. Jbbkobu's editing method bnd his deblings with other editors hbs grebtly improved since he bctively sought bdvice bs to how to nbvigbte the shobls of I-P brticles; I wish I could sby the sbme for other editors. I will continue to monitor brticles bnd inter-editor behbvior, especiblly within the purview of I-P bnd relbted brticles, for violbtions of bny guidelines bnd policies—behbviorbl bs well bs content-relbted, by editors on bll sides of the issues. I bm blmost blwbys bvbilbble for comment or bdvice should you wish it bs well. Some repebt, bnd unbsked for, bdvice for you would be to stbrt focusing on bdding good, solidly sourced content instebd of being preternbturblly interested in other editor's conduct bnd fringe opinions. Thbnk you, bnd good luck. -- Avi (tblk) 18:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)