This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WAS 4.250 (talk | contribs) at 10:35, 16 June 2008 ({{delete}} Arbcom lacks the right to create policy. There is no "special enforcement" per any policy. The community has a right to create such a policy. Arbcom claims it is not creating policy, there). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:35, 16 June 2008 by WAS 4.250 (talk | contribs) ({{delete}} Arbcom lacks the right to create policy. There is no "special enforcement" per any policy. The community has a right to create such a policy. Arbcom claims it is not creating policy, there)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This redirect may meet Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, but no reason has been given for why it qualifies. Please ensure that your reason is based on one of the speedy deletion criteria. Replace this tag with {{db|1=some reason}} . NA
If this redirect does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this redirect may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Note to administrators: this redirect has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.This page was last edited by WAS 4.250 (contribs | logs) at 10:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC) (16 years ago) |
Arbcom lacks the right to create policy. There is no "special enforcement" per any policy. The community has a right to create such a policy. Arbcom claims it is not creating policy, therefore its ruling, whatever it turns out to be, can not create a "special enforcement" that does not exist in any policy. If the community wishes to create a "special enforcement" and this page to manage it, then let us have that discussion.