This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lihaas (talk | contribs) at 18:15, 24 August 2008 (→Question on appropriate behaviour: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:15, 24 August 2008 by Lihaas (talk | contribs) (→Question on appropriate behaviour: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
Thanks for visiting my talk page. If you are considering posting a message for me, please observe Wikiquette: *post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the five rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
Talk archives
|
A small question
Just out of curiosity - why did you cascade protect User:KrakatoaKatie/PGPkey? (Specifically the cascade bit.) -- Mentisock 10:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply and for fixing it. :-) -- Mentisock 09:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Kanabekobaton/Euroleague
I changed my RFCU rationale from F to G because the account was around for a while before I posted to AN. The change to Kanabekobaton's userpage, the block on the Japanese Misplaced Pages, and the timing of the SUL registrations are all suspicious, though. DarkAudit (talk) 01:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep an eye on beauty pageants, television stations/networks, Eurovision, and the Olympics. Those seem to be the big targets. DarkAudit (talk) 01:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- 74.85.13.56 reverted a couple of reversions of Euroleague's edits, and is going after similar athletics pages at present. Keep an eye out. DarkAudit (talk) 02:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
dont get swayed by propaganda
you seem to have hastily made a edit protect without adequate discussion on article talk page in amarnath land transfer controversy..please undo your actions..user:lihaas motives questionable!there seems to be no dispute after merger..further all edits were referenced, neutral and verifiable (if you dont succumb to propaganda, you can check them individually)..at a bare minimum i request you to reverse your edit protect..thanks..Kashmircloud (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:AIV
What seriously are you on? Can you read English? How can someone who vandalize articles and is warned by several editors not a vandal? 90% of his/her edits have been reverted. I'm sorry I'm not on Wiki every waking moment to catch someone as soon as they make the edit. Just because he or she doesn't follow the usual pattern of a vandal doesn't make them one. Additionally, I made no comment to WP:3RR, so I don't know where that. I am replacing my request back on the board and asking that it be looked at by editor as you clearly cannot perform your job duties. KM*hearts*MC (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Question on appropriate behaviour
Just have a look at this talk page (http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy) I was wondering if you think I was out of line. I stated in my edit (and often times otherwise) "Use discussion facility before changing and unchanging, as well as redirecting." I did the same in saying I was requesting a lock (which is ultimately out of my hand anyways. But did I do the right thing in my response? Often times those involved in the debate (I can imagine those vilifying me are from the Indian side) get too emotional (see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy#NPOV_Status.3D (which I also just realised he made the more 'productive' edit after his name-calling).
ps- Just as a heads up, I'm running this text by another admin too. Lihaas (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)