Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KM*hearts*MC (talk | contribs) at 02:34, 26 August 2008 (→WP:AIV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Talk archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

A small question

Just out of curiosity - why did you cascade protect User:KrakatoaKatie/PGPkey? (Specifically the cascade bit.) -- Mentisock 10:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply and for fixing it. :-) -- Mentisock 09:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Kanabekobaton/Euroleague

I changed my RFCU rationale from F to G because the account was around for a while before I posted to AN. The change to Kanabekobaton's userpage, the block on the Japanese Misplaced Pages, and the timing of the SUL registrations are all suspicious, though. DarkAudit (talk) 01:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep an eye on beauty pageants, television stations/networks, Eurovision, and the Olympics. Those seem to be the big targets. DarkAudit (talk) 01:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

74.85.13.56 reverted a couple of reversions of Euroleague's edits, and is going after similar athletics pages at present. Keep an eye out. DarkAudit (talk) 02:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

dont get swayed by propaganda

you seem to have hastily made a edit protect without adequate discussion on article talk page in amarnath land transfer controversy..please undo your actions..user:lihaas motives questionable!there seems to be no dispute after merger..further all edits were referenced, neutral and verifiable (if you dont succumb to propaganda, you can check them individually)..at a bare minimum i request you to reverse your edit protect..thanks..Kashmircloud (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV

What seriously are you on? Can you read English? How can someone who vandalize articles and is warned by several editors not a vandal? 90% of his/her edits have been reverted. I'm sorry I'm not on Wiki every waking moment to catch someone as soon as they make the edit. Just because he or she doesn't follow the usual pattern of a vandal doesn't make them one. Additionally, I made no comment to WP:3RR, so I don't know where that. I am replacing my request back on the board and asking that it be looked at by editor as you clearly cannot perform your job duties. KM*hearts*MC (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I am fully aware of Misplaced Pages's polices, which is the reason why I requested that the user be blocked. Your justification of not blocking him or her was rushed and not related to anything I stated. As mentioned above, I did not state anywhere of him/her violating and three revert edit rule. Additionally, you claim he/she doesn't follow the usual pattern of a "vandal". Just because a serial killer doesn't follow the usual pattern doesn't remove the fact that they are a serial killer. As I stated before, he/she has added very non-factual or "quid pro quo" information to articles and they have been removed several times by various editors (along with warnings). Whether he/she is adding this information every hour or every other days, if he/she is being warned by several editors and his edits are being reverted, that says "vandal" all over it. The bottom line is you hastily rushed into your ruling without taking the time to investigate the matter. I understand that this is a hobby, however, you were nominated and given a position of authority on this site. You should take the time to do the things that are asked of you. I cannot assume good faith without who is not willing to do the job they are asked of. KM*hearts*MC (talk) 02:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Question on appropriate behaviour

Just have a look at this talk page (http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy) I was wondering if you think I was out of line. I stated in my edit (and often times otherwise) "Use discussion facility before changing and unchanging, as well as redirecting." I did the same in saying I was requesting a lock (which is ultimately out of my hand anyways. But did I do the right thing in my response? Often times those involved in the debate (I can imagine those vilifying me are from the Indian side) get too emotional (see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy#NPOV_Status.3D (which I also just realised he made the more 'productive' edit after his name-calling).

ps- Just as a heads up, I'm running this text by another admin too. Lihaas (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind (if you do then don't respond), but just for future reference, what part was overstepped. My first part was trying to show them not to be uncivil (http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy#protected_for_1_week). In what was it uncivil. I got a message from the other person that it would have been best if I didn't respond to that accusation. Is that what would have been the best? (In case this comes across confrontational, I'm really not intending that way. I wouldn't get near swearing, especially in front of women, and katie at that ;))

i'll take you advice as you've seen this. It may be best to wait for some time, time to hit the books anyhoo. But was it this phrase: "I will forward the two of you to the wikipedia rules"? I know the cityvalu person, we've had agreements and disagreements before (you can see the text in my talk, his talk, and the article), but the IP and kashmircloud I didn't know about. Lihaas (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm Ready

Ready to go! The Dominator_Edits 12:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)