This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Atulsnischal (talk | contribs) at 07:02, 10 November 2008 (→Blocked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:02, 10 November 2008 by Atulsnischal (talk | contribs) (→Blocked)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Atulsnischal, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Remember that people's comments on this page may be only one side of a story.
 List of Archived Talk Pages |
|---|
Hi Atul
Hi Atul,
How do you do? I saw that you have collected a lot of information regarding Mairh rajputs and I have also embarked on the same journey to trace my roots and geneology. Can we correspond over email? My email id is gaurav_verma22@yahoo.com. Please drop me a line so that we can collaborate.
Thanks Gaurav —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaurav verma22 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
It seems you are unable to edit Misplaced Pages without persistent disruption and personal attacks, so you have been blocked indefinitely. Indefinite does not necessarily mean permanent, but you will need to demonstrate a much better understanding of the rules before you will be permitted to edit again. If you can't do that, it will be permanent. Kafziel 08:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
you guys are gtting into ego hassels with me, i have no time ok, get some some growing up to do i guess, take your time.
Atulsnischal (talk) 08:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Atulsnischal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I have contributed to several articles and several hundred hours on wikipedia, I was blocked and then was elevated in quick succession to permanent block by an administrator who was already an existing member of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Sikhism, and i was blocked over some heated arguments then related to one single article the Sikh Rajputs (under Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Sikhism). I feel the blocking admin was unfair and he was from within the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Sikhism so couldn't be impartial. Anyways quite some time has passed and heated emotions have been overcome by better sense now. I have made some useful contributions to wikipedia since: A) From 04:11, 30 September 2008 - To - 17:56, 13 October 2008 - from the IP address: 71.72.18.229 (talk) and B) From 13:29, 14 August 2008 - To - 19:21, 8 November 2008 - from the IP address: 99.235.98.169 (talk) I am also giving more time to understanding wikipedia rules to contribute constructively. Today I was trying to create the "Indradhanush" article but Misplaced Pages software wouldn't let me create a new article as I have to sign in and my user name is blocked permanently as of now. I will like to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages under my own user name and not from anonymous IP addresses. Thanks
Decline reason:
You have been unblocked already. This request is moot. — Sandstein 22:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
The key here is to 1) listen and learn, with respect to formating (especially references), 2) listen and collaborate with those that disagree with your own opinion and 3) try to have fun and don't take criticism to heart. Request handled by: David D. (Talk) 22:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks David,
Like we have discussed before others are always welcome to contribute constructively and improve on my and other contributors contributions without censoring it, editors with genuine interest will eventually come along and improve an article and help out with what they can and are comfortable with like formatting references etc. that you have requested before too, in time other interested editors do improve articles, correct spelling, grammar, remove POV, research and quote references...... there is no rule that one contributor should deliver a finished thesis on Misplaced Pages. It is am ongoing valuntry process with multiple editors helping out.
Editors will generally find and better an article they like, eventually, an impatient editor with a big ego can not bully others what they need done and force others to comply, or threaten them or their account (if some have special admin privileges for instance).
So I just wish everyone well and lets just contribute what we can and what our time, level of education and skills lets us.
Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, no body can be bullied or forced to deliver a completed thesis.
When because of some personality clashes and online bullying if some editors become aware that their constant tracking of another's work and picking up arguments on each article he or she is contributing makes the other editor unduly distressed and disrupts his normal life then one should make it a point not to clash again or stalk that editors work and leave it to other thousands of editors on wikipedia at present and thousands that will come along in future, to collaborate and help such editors with whom you are personally finding it difficult to collaborate.
But thanks again as in this particular case you were not involved with the Sikh Rajput article in question for which the block on my account was made, but please remember I just contribute what I can. I hope you wont stalk my contributions as I have complained before for a year or two now and try to force me to do anything your way.
It is best not to get personal and we should all keep our dealings to the particular situation at hand. There is no fun when editors have to worry about bullys stalking them for years on and their work online on a daily basis.
If you saw the situation here and did what you thought right in good faith, thanks.
But if there is any politics involved here that from now on you can have your way with me and threaten me forever that you can always block my account again, then we have a problem.
Kindly leave it up to a Administrator who is impartial.
Maybe after all you feel you just did the right thing and in that case please excuse me, but i am sure you can forgive me as we did clash before several times and since I have stopped contributing anything major to those articles.......
Any way thanks again and best wishes