Misplaced Pages

User talk:KingsOfHearts

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KingsOfHearts (talk | contribs) at 17:49, 15 December 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:49, 15 December 2008 by KingsOfHearts (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

KingsOfHearts (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

First of I woukd like to say this may be one of the worst handeld ANI's in the histoty of wikipedia. This was more about silencing an opposing idea than actualy finding socks or whatever the ANI was for in the first place. Unless there is some rule on only one account per family please Unban both accounts Kings and frus. It was mentioned that fru was my brother about four months ago, http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Alex_Bakharev#Please_UnBlock_me. I do not know about the accounts made after the block, I had nothing to do with either of them, altough I sence there may have been some foul play in the checkuser and would not put it past Baseball bugs or some of the others involved to create them to get me in more trouble. I can not assume good faith any longer in this situation. I inkling on what the results of a checkuser on baseball bugs would yeild. JackyRT was unrelated, yet he was still banned for being a sock of me. ya.... Please stop throwing around troll accusations as an excuse to ingnore me. I also welcome any other pointless accusations based on speculation to get me banned, which I will systematically shoot down. I would like to request permission to create an alternate account to edit solely on ani.

I am the brother of fru23, We have never editied the same page or interacted with each other on wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Fru23 http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/KingsOfHearts

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Requesting_Topic_ban_for_User:Fru23

Category:
User talk:KingsOfHearts Add topic