This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Xoder (talk | contribs) at 22:04, 8 March 2004 (commat -> commercial at???). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:04, 8 March 2004 by Xoder (talk | contribs) (commat -> commercial at???)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Addition of text from the code article
From the code article:
- In the days when Morse code was widely used, elaborate commercial codes that encoded complete phrases into single words (five-letter groups) were developed, so that telegraphers became conversant with such "words" as BYOXO ("Are you trying to crawl out of it?"), LIOUY ("Why do you not answer my question?"), and AYYLU ("Not clearly coded, repeat more clearly."). The purpose of these codes was to save on cable costs.
Should this be added to the Morse code article?
Probably, but I also put it back into code; it was a good example of the data compression use that wasn't otherwise well covered there; I also gave it a slightly better introduction. --LDC
International morse code different from original Morse code
This article needs to take into account that the international morse code that is used today is not the same as the telegraphic system that Samuel F. B. Morse created (which was based on numbers). The story is to be found in William Pierpoint's The Art And Skill of Radio-Telegraphy. Sorry, I don't have time to write it up right now, maybe later. -ARJ
American railroad code
it would be nice to have american railroad code here as a table as well as international code. If I get to it I'll add it
Trivia
Just saw this - an anagram of "The Morse code" is "Here comes dots". Well, I found it amusing... -- Jim Regan 03:17 17 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Elimination of CW requirement in amateur radio licensing
WRTC 2003 eliminated the requirement (made optional) for CW in amateur radio licensing. Did a re-write to incorporate this info, fill in some blanks, and otherwise do some light editing - de NG3K Bill 10:44 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Prosigns and abbreviations
Also added a bunch of commonly used CW abbreviations. Bill 18:02 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Clarified the difference between prosigns and abbreviations; modified the taxonomy to correspond to this; other tweaks Bill 17:01 26 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Common cw abbreviations should just list the most important few here. Maybe abreviations could have their own article just like Q-codes. Tero 10:34, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Actually, experienced CW operators use abbreviations extensively. Most listed here are quite common and important; could be a separate article, I guess. I would tend to NOT include items that are common abbreviations outside the CW-world however (e.g. QCWA). Bill 22:58, 31 Dec 2003 (UTC)
..--. is given as the code for the exclamation mark, but from some searching it seems there is no official code for it. It's ---. over radio in the USA and Canada according to note 1 at http://homepages.tesco.net/~a.wadsworth/MBcode.htm - Jeandré 2004-02-20t09:48z
The prosign SN (VE)
The prosign SN (...-.) is in the international standard, and is actually used by some HF amateurs, though I concede that we have R and QSL for that. See a Google search to confirm this. arj 16:15, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Error codes
I hear "e e e" for "error" about 80 percent of the time. The remaining is almost always a string of continuous dits. I think that this article should mention all variants that are in use, and clearly indicate which of them is standardized by the ITU - which is the latter (........). arj 16:15, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
The article says that Morse code has five different "states" unlike binary, but I think it really does have two: on and off. If we call a 'dit' 1 and a roughly equal amount of silence 0, then SOS could be roughly 101010 111011101110 101010 (10 being a full 'dit', 1110 being a full 'dah')...more zeroes would be a longer pause. Hence, Morse code is a binary system depending on how you look at it...
I think maybe comparing it with binary in the article isn't so great an idea because, as I demonstrated, the interpretation is a bit subjective.
--Furrykef 00:23, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Commat
Someone changed the "commat" to "commercial at". Is this what the official word is? I didn't see it in any of the news stories surrounding this new character.