This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yulia Romero (talk | contribs) at 17:36, 5 February 2009 (True!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:36, 5 February 2009 by Yulia Romero (talk | contribs) (True!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves
Indeed, EUobserver states that The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 percent of the 100 billion cubic metres of gas and 15 million tonnes of crude oil in the disputed zone, leaving the rest to Ukraine. But it would be correct if the reserves are evenly distributed over the area. There is no evidence that this is the case. If a journalist from EUobserver made a mistake or unjustified assertion, it is not a reason to repeat it here. We have to use common sence while editing articles.--AndriyK (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- True, it is very whisfull thinking and a Ukrainian official says something completely different... until it is investigated 100% nobody can be sure about this sort of things... — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)