This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Encyclopaedia21 (talk | contribs) at 14:51, 5 June 2009 (→A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:51, 5 June 2009 by Encyclopaedia21 (talk | contribs) (→A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)I'm bullied by the cyber-thugs on Misplaced Pages. If you ever try to question the information that users present as cannon on wikipedia, you get shot down in about 30 seconds. So liberalism has run amuk on Misplaced Pages, i.e. they only allow glowing information about their dear leader, President Barack Hussein Obama. They only allow alarmist, wild, wacky claims that the earth is warming, when in fact, it is cooling, and the list goes on and on. It appears that Misplaced Pages is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories.
A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies
Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)