This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Graciella (talk | contribs) at 16:43, 27 November 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:43, 27 November 2005 by Graciella (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hello Haakon, I was going to supply the usual welcome to Misplaced Pages but I seen from your contributions that you have been an intermittent contributor for more than a year. Somehow you slipped under the radar of the welcoming committee! Or perhaps you are more active in another language.
I am sure this is all superfluous, but here it is anyway:
Here are some useful links if you need any help:
You can sign posts on talk pages by entering four tildes (~~~~~); the system automatically inserts your username with a datestamp. If you have any questions, see Misplaced Pages:Help, post a question to the Village pump, or leave a message on my Talk page. Enjoy, -- Viajero 18:55, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
greetings
Hi. I am looking for people interested in computing for inviting them in a non-Misplaced Pages (and non-Wikimedia) wiki project. I found you by looking at the history of the KGX article. I had a look at your Misplaced Pages contributions and found them good. I believe my project, which is a wiki about computer science and a wiki about information technology, will be of interest to you. If you want to be considered for invitation in the "core team" of the project, list your name at User:Npc/List. If you ignore this notice, I promise you that I will never send you any more messages. Thank you very much! Npc 23:42, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This link is not a spam sir.
Dear sir,
This link does not contain spam. It is a very populer site and it has about 500 visitors a day so please let it be added into the winmx page. link: http://www.oldapps.com/winMX.htm
Thank You, admin
- Whether the site is popular or not is besides the issue; Misplaced Pages is not a link collection. Please see Misplaced Pages:External links, specifically, the "What should not be linked to" section. Quote: Adding links to one's own page is strongly discouraged. The mass adding of links to any website is also strongly discouraged ... I'm guessing you have some vested interest in oldapps.com, and you have certainly mass-added it to many articles, even when there is no clear interest for old versions of the applications. Finally, the site is pretty loaded with advertisement, which makes your motivation for adding the links even clearer, in my opinion. I am, however, not an admin, and if you disagree with me and the others reverting your adds, please raise the issue at Village Pump or another venue, and refer to any consensus there in your edit summaries if you continue to add the links. Haakon 21:06, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Proxy Server
Stop editing Proxy Server page.You've deleted some of the most quality proxy server resources proxyblind, digitalcybersoft and keep some unknown as whatismyproxy page that have nothing to do or have a very little information about proxy except one simple testing. If you chose to editing some page then take a look for quality resources about proxy server and not to preferring page that you like for whatever reason.
Thanks
- I'm sorry, I did not mean to discriminate; I removed the other link too now. Misplaced Pages is not a link repository, we link to external resources that may be informative for those who have further interest in the topic. DMOZ has everything else, and we link to the relevant DMOZ entry too. Haakon 15:04, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
You said Quote:"Clean up External links: we link only to places useful for people who have further interest in the topic. DMOZ has everything else.) "
One link is still there except Dmoz.If you preferer DMOZ as sources for proxy server (however i disagree with you) then leave only DMOZ.
The problem is that DMOZ does have only some links to proxies.DMOZ is simple directory resources.
I'm more for option to keep quality resources as it was all time (you suddenly start with deleting everything).For example the link that you forget to delete (Proxy) have some info about working of proxyserver, proxyblind (have a lot usefull infos), digitalcybersoft(have info's with programs too).
I would ask you to think again about your move.If you understand how works proxies servers then take a time and look to deleted quality resources and place them back again.
We do not need 20 links but 4-5 quality links is more than advisable.Furthermore if you can find there almost anything about proxy.
- If you think the DMOZ category for proxy servers have too few links, you should submit links to it. While some of the CGI-style proxy sites may have had information about the workings of proxies, they were not described to have, nor were that their main purpose. The link that remains is for a richly-illustrated article that explains more about how proxies work, and those kinds of articles are what we should link to. People can find concrete proxy services from DMOZ. If we link to such a service, it would be hard to link to just a few, since there are so many, and people will want to add their favorite. Believe me, I've seen how this goes :-) Haakon 16:49, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Your link to DMOZ category is not correct.You link to CGi Proxy and that's are web based proxy. You have client, direct category etc... If you want to keep only DMOZ (it is very unreasonable decision as i told it before.DMOZ do not anymore update of their link category.You should use http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet/Proxying_and_Filtering/Hosted_Proxy_Services/Free/ instead that is regulary updated) then link to http://dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Proxying_and_Filtering/Hosted_Proxy_Services/Free/ (but it is outdated) And you really need to keep quality links and not only DMOZ. You did chosed again "richly-illustrated article".That's exactly what i tried to told you.Keep quality links with a lot information that are helpfull to visitor. Look at http://www.digitalcybersoft.com/ There are a lot information, some programs Look at http://www.proxyblind.org/ Pictorial description about proxy server, proxy test, a lot free programs, community
I would like to suggest you to keep 2 quality sites mentioned above.Take a look by both sites and make decision about quality of information that they provide regarding "proxy server".
- Thanks, I fixed the DMOZ links so we use Google instead. I found a good and comprehensive tutorial on about.com, so I added a link to that. Proxyblind has pretty terrible HTML, which makes it almost impossible to read any of the tutorials in Firefox. Haakon 13:04, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Nice that you use google.About proxyblind.I do not have any problem to read whole page in firefox (version 1.0.7), opera (version 8.x or IE (6.0)?Everything load smoothly. Are you sure that everything works with your configuration of firefox?