Misplaced Pages

:Good article reassessment/Homeopathy/1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Brunton (talk | contribs) at 07:34, 4 June 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:34, 4 June 2009 by Brunton (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Homeopathy

Article (edit | visual edit | history· Article talk (edit | history· WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

FA discussion can be seen here. Brunton (talk) 07:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Category:
Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Homeopathy/1 Add topic