Please leave new comments at the bottom of the page.
You can click here to add a new message at the bottom of my talk page...
Don't forget to sign your posts with "~~~~"!
I can no longer contribute to Misplaced Pages like I used to...this is a good thing: life in the real world is keeping me very busy, with important new research to perform. As such, I may not be very responsive to messages here. -- Scientizzle
FYI, back in 2006 you voted in a unanimous AfD DELETE for TOMS SHOES, which has attempted at least twice to re-emerge with virtually no changes. It is now back again as TOMS Shoes. Here's the current AfD: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/TOMS SHOES (2nd nomination) —Danorton (talk) 07:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
blanking
Somebody blanked your talk page. I reverted it without checking what you had written. Sorry if I wasn't supposed to do that. Griffinofwales (talk) 21:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it--I appreciate your edit. I'm happy to let stupid insults remain as a testament to a vandal's immaturity, but blanking this page prevents proper communication & collaboration, so I prefer that sort of nonsense be reverted. — Scientizzle 21:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
SHH
I heard that I was going to die in 2048. Do you think about when you'll die a lot? How do you think you'll die? Matthew Francis (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- This is inappropriate -- at best it's trolling, at worst it's a death threat. The recent trolling efforts and attempts to add self-promotional content are over the line. For me, it is the third strike. I will support a block or a complete ban from WP. — CactusWriter | 06:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. Mr. Francis, what was your goal here? I'm inclined to consider this trolling myself, considering you are (presumably) the author behind various useless provocations and other nonsense directed towards just me. Examples abound of you acting like a complete jerk to many other editors. Then there's other nonsense, trying to promote your YouTube videos, and creating pages for your non-notable friends. I think it's clear that although you appear to have broad knowledge of some of the less-appreciated elements of the film industry, your interactions are, on the whole, too disruptive to tolerate any longer. Please find a new hobby. — Scientizzle 16:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
And another one...
Just to let you know, I decided to take out this one myself. — CactusWriter | 23:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Nootheridavailable
I am slowly familiarizing myself with "recent" events related to the homeopathy article. The last time I visited the homeopathy article it was just about the time when "Dr.Jhingade" first arrived and I have missed all of the intervening events related to his participation at Misplaced Pages. Thanks for the link you provided that provides insight into the difficulty of dealing with this particular source of frustration. I think some people have a faith in the efficacy of homeopathy that may come from experiences such as those reported here, experiences in which self-resolving conditions improve during the use of a homeopathic treatments. My current hypothesis is that "Dr.Jhingade" has, through his personal experiences, developed a strong faith in the efficacy of homeopathy. In my experience it is all too easy for such people to discount scientific studies of homeopathy that do not show positive results. Sometimes those who have had positive personal experiences with homeopathy will simply say, "Well, those studies with negative results may not have been done correctly. They were probably performed by skeptics who do not know how to properly treat patients homeopathically". I'd be interested to know if in your experience it has ever been possible to engage "Dr.Jhingade" in discussions of these kinds of issues. From what I've seen he is just not very communicative in the sense of being able to maintain a discussion thread where there is a give and take of ideas. --JWSchmidt (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
|
