This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoySmith (talk | contribs) at 18:53, 3 December 2005 (→Votes: go to three numbered lists?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:53, 3 December 2005 by RoySmith (talk | contribs) (→Votes: go to three numbered lists?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Votes
I think somewhere at the top of the page we should describe standardized wording for votes, particularly given that the rather contradictory verbs endorse (the deletion) and oppose (the undeletion request) amount to the same thing. Perhaps stick with, undelete and keep deleted. Marskell 14:30, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
- There is already a yellow box describing precisely that. In the change to Deletion review, the notion of reviewing a not-delete debate was introduced, and the old wording doesn't really fit that. -Splash 04:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ah yes. To qualify then, we should follow the wording as presented. (And perhaps we should tidy the top of the page). Marskell 04:50, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
I think it would be easier to read through this stuff if we switched to a format similar to that used in RFA. Have three numbered lists, "Endorse", "Relist", and "Overturn". --RoySmith 18:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Archived to history
(i.e. deleted)
If I trimmed any current threads, a firm spanking is always welcome. - brenneman 06:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)