Misplaced Pages

User:Z Victor Alpha

You may want to revoke his talk page privileges too after he attacked you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind, I saw this and reblocked them. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm shocked that the person blocked for personal attacks would stoop to personal attacks. And I'm not sure what a knickerpicker is, but it sounds like fun and I'm willing to try it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 05:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Haha. Eagles 24/7 (C) 05:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

LBHS Cheerleader again

Scarlet Robin (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is a sockpuppet of User:Luna 9 per WP:DUCK, and (s)he may be a sock/meatpuppet of User:LBHS Cheerleader as well as you have suggested. Would you kindly create a ticket at WP:SPI so we can get an IP block or range block in this? Thanks in advance! PCHS-NJROTC 17:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks like someone else beat me to the block. Eventually these kids will discover boys or rap music or beer and get bored with Misplaced Pages. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I brought it up at AN/I for an immediate block, but I was wondering if you could start a thread at WP:SPI so we can get checkuser involvement here (especially since it appears LBHSC habitually uses open proxies that would need to be blocked). I'd do it myself, but as settlement in a disagreement with another user, I informally agreed to avoid getting into issues related to LBHS Cheerleader except when unavoidable, in which case I would have an administrator (like yourself) deal with it instead of getting involved in discussion myself. PCHS-NJROTC 22:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and by the way, it appears that User:Luna 9 has confessed to being the same person as User:Doofy10 at User Talk:Luna 9. I'd suggest a checkuser to verify, however. PCHS-NJROTC 23:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Please help me

I read WP:DISPUTE, but I don't quite understand what I should do. I went to the Project page first. But what should I do next? Please tell me where I should go to solve the disputes? Thank you in advance.--Je suis tres fatigue (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:DISPUTE has a list of different things you can try, like third opinion. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:3 says that you can use it only when just two editors are involved. The issue I am concerned about involves at least four editors.--Je suis tres fatigue (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

You can try one of the other things on the list, then. Sometimes, we have to accept that consensus is not with us, too. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Or you can make sockpuppet accounts and get indefinitely blocked, I guess, if that sounds like more fun to you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jackie Owens

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jackie Owens, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jackie Owens. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -- timed 02:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Already deleted per WP:CSD#G3. -- Blanchardb -- timed 02:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The talk page stalker strikes again... Beeblebrox (talk) 02:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Oppose! This is an injustice against the spirits of the fictional victims of Jackie Owens! Misplaced Pages is biased against nonreal people! Strike! Strike! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 15 February 2010

• News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more

• In the news: Labor squeeze revisited, journalist consultations, philosophy bungles, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Talkback

SRQ block review

FeralDruid has instructions on SRQ's page for how to lose Jimbo. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but I don't feel any need to do that; if SRQ wants to make the talk page unreadable, I don't mind not reading it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Smile

This made me smile. Thanks. --John (talk) 04:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, I've never seen such a request go through, so it must be a software issue... right? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 05:34, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 22 February 2010

• News and notes: $2 Million donation, cybersquatting, comScore statistics and more

• In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

LOOK

I don't know what your problem is, but MINE is the fact that my username was stolen by someone trying to bias the hell out of an article, removing links to an organization critical of same, pushing bad wikilinks (the difference between a tear gas canister, and a "canister shot" which is basically a tank-fired grenade, is MAJOR), and then proceeded to "report" me to block my username in order to cover their own reversions.

And then I was never informed of where the "discussion" of this took place in order to make a comment back, and now I'm fighting some stupid fucked-up bot that keeps removing the discussion when I try to put it back to fucking reply to it.

To top it all off, I try to include a link inside your fucked-up "unblock" template, and it comes out blanking the damn template.

So you'll excuse me if I'm a bit pissed off at the moment. This place is one of the most fucked-up, messed-up shitholes I've ever seen in operation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saint Pancake By Irn (talk • contribs)

Thank you for reporting your block-evading sockpuppet; I have blocked it. If you want to request a new username, you can do so by following the instructions on your original user talk page. Amusingly, you could have just created an appropriate username and edited productively instead of creating a username that breaks the rules in the same way and using it to come swear at me on my talk page. But since this is the most fucked up shithole you've ever seen, you probably won't want to use it any longer anyway. Goodbye. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Correct me if I'm wrong

I have a hunch about this guy → 91.55.97.142 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I think he is related to 91.55.112.142 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and he was caught thrice screwing the C-135 Stratolifter article which was promptly reverted by BilCat (talk · contribs). Also, his current request for review to unblock seem to be pointing towards further trolling too. Regards. --Dave 23:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)