This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SporkBot (talk | contribs) at 20:32, 21 January 2012 (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:32, 21 January 2012 by SporkBot (talk | contribs) (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg 02:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Wendy Swanscombe
- Wendy Swanscombe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another target of our newest(?) serial deprodder; prod rationale was "Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person". In any event, I can find no substantive treatment of this perhaps-living person in reliable, independent sources, nor evidence that any of the criteria of WP:AUTHOR are satisfied. Deor (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: The article under discussion here has been {{rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the Article Rescue Squadron.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Well known and prolific author has 66 hits on Gbooks . Inniverse (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: zero hits on google news archive. Six books on amazon, only one review ever posted by a reader. The books do exist (you can preview one on google books -- random quote, page 132, "But another orgasm was evidently being brewed in another pair of fine hairy balls"), but commentary and coverage from the outside world does not.--Milowent (talk) 17:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. As I said in the prod, no evidence that this is anything other than a house pseudonym for the Nexus porno imprint. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - No sources exist to establish notability. Fails WP:AUTHOR. SnottyWong talk 23:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.