This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 4 August 2010 (Signing comment by 115.240.119.66 - "→Lot of POVs in first paragraph: "). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:59, 4 August 2010 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by 115.240.119.66 - "→Lot of POVs in first paragraph: ")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | India Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on February 20, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
== Reference Number 18,19 are referred from Malayalam Regional sites,so as an english wiki please remove the lines with that reference.so in that case "Connection with other terror networks" has no evidence.So in my opinion it should remove. (Achu 14:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC))
Popupar front is not a political party. It has a political strategy for supporting the down-trodden in the society, but not a political organisation. It is just a confederation of different like minded organisations. Popularindia 12:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I dont know what is a neutrality issue here. Need to remove the tag.Popularindia 07:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Many events are listed here. I feel that a brief detail of each event can be given, either in the same page or a separate page. If not proper references can be put for each events.
popular front do not have any link with terrorist organizations in india or abroad ,here given reference was fake and non-existent so as an encyclopedia that fake information should not come in this page,so i removed the fake link --Fazlu2010 (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Initial level of formatting and wikifying is done
The page has originally contained un-wikified article. Now I have edited page and cleaned all the WOI and POV. Please remove the tag for deletion Sundaram7 11:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Removed the deletion tag. It is found that user:Bakasuprman, user:Mereda has added this tag, not the administrators. Sundaram7 04:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Tag AfD is no more valid
The arguments that are raised by user:mareda at ] is no more exisits.Ashokachakra 05:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Pfi.jpg
Image:Pfi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Rewrite needed
The prose and the balance of this article are both lacking. I'm going to be rewriting several sections across the next few days. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Copy and paste of propaganda materials and its circulation need to be done in radical websites not in wikipedia. Rick jens (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Article needs lock
This article needs to be locked, as the matter has repeatedly been twisted by some editors copying some propaganda materials.
Popular Front of India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full protection. High level of IP vandalism. Rick jens (talk) 16:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Rick jens (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Changes by people associated with Popular Front of India
I suspect that people employed or associated with Popular Front of India and Jamaat-e-Islami Hind are forking this article with their propaganda.
These are the google news search results ]
Please also take a look at the related discussion-
Talk:2010_hand_chopping_incident_in_Kerala#Taliban_Courts_run_by_Popular_Front_of_India Rick jens (talk) 16:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- It is revealed that, user:Rick jens is a POV pusher by the Wiki Administrators. I have a strong suspicion he is a sock puppet of some banned users in Misplaced Pages. see Wikiquette_alerts about him -- Indiashines (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
As I suspected the editors who pushes propaganda in these articles seems to be delegated by Popular Front of India. There is a serious conflict of interest.Rick jens (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, it is commented by Wiki admin that User:Rick jens is a
- Sorry no interest to respond to your personal allegations.Rick jens (talk) 17:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Lot of POVs in first paragraph
The reference is just a comment (Rejoinder) of a user on a the detailed report of Empower India Conferece came in the weekly. This doesn't meet the criteria of an wikipedia reference. The "Love Jihad" is proven as a fake story and the high court says that the arguments are baseless. ,,. The reference is just a comment (Rejoinder) of a user on a the detailed report of Empower India Conferece came in the weekly. This doesn't meet the criteria of an wikipedia reference. The "Love Jihad" is proven as a fake story and the high court says that the arguments are baseless. ,,, .
Now, there are a lot of allegations put in this article which is not suitable as per wiki etiquette. The references are either broken links or in malayalam!. -- Indiashines (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
It is hereby requested to discuss before you further push information from propaganda pamphlets. Rick jens (talk) 17:38, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop reverting. Please participate in the discussion before you do edits. -- Indiashines (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Rick Jens is consistently playing truant & irresponsibly vandalizing this article to push his POV . This article deems to be locked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.119.66 (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories: