Misplaced Pages

Talk:National Council Against Health Fraud

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MastCell (talk | contribs) at 18:30, 9 November 2010 (→Primary sources: c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:30, 9 November 2010 by MastCell (talk | contribs) (→Primary sources: c)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Council Against Health Fraud article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
WikiProject iconSkepticism Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1 - 13 Dec '06
  2. Archive 2 13 Dec '06 - 26 Dec '06
  3. Archive 3 19 Dec '06 - 30 Dec '06
  4. Archive 4 26 Dec '06 - 31 Dec '06
  5. Archive 5 31 Dec '06 - Jan '07

Primary sources

Using with primary sources does not pass weight. Do not restore with primary sources so many sections about a non-notable subject. Using primary sources that do not show WP:WEIGHT could be construed as WP:LIBEL. QuackGuru (talk) 18:01, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

I share the concern over the sourcing here. We should not be sourcing material on lawsuits solely to court records. If these lawsuits are truly notable on an encyclopedic level, then we should be able to find some independent, secondary-source coverage of them. If such coverage doesn't exist, then a logical conclusion would be that these lawsuits just aren't that notable. If no reputable, independent sources have bothered to cover the suits, then why should we? And dynamicchiropractic.com is not an appropriate encyclopedic source, so let's put that aside. MastCell  18:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories: