This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lihaas (talk | contribs) at 20:12, 20 January 2011 (→List of terrorist incidents, 2011). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:12, 20 January 2011 by Lihaas (talk | contribs) (→List of terrorist incidents, 2011)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome
Hello, Trelane, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Misplaced Pages Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
January 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of terrorist incidents, 2011, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'll see you before the arbcom before I allow you to continue to degrade articles on Misplaced Pages. Trelane (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case, there is the link. Please do it right now. O Fenian (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
List of terrorist incidents, 2011
No probs ;) Its happened before. he thinks he owns every terrorism article (particularly where the IRA are concerned) and can scare people off with his bullying.(Lihaas (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)).
- He is again hijacking the page to stop discussion. what is the next avenue of DR? if you start it ill support you. as can be seen the reverters have not attempted to discuss the issue onthe talk page.
- See: WP:RFCCLihaas (talk) 20:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- update: ive tried RFC. Talk:List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2011#CriteriaLihaas (talk) 20:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- have you tried the other avenues as hes clearly beign disruptive by "stamping his feet" and not attempting to discuss anything!
- RFCC has a case: "Before requesting community comment, at least two editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem. " (emphasis added), weve told him to discuss the issue he keeps resorting to the same diktats.(Lihaas (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)).
- Right now I'm working from a Reductio_ad_absurdum basis. Based on the false Consensus that terror "must be called such by a reliable source", I have listed the Wikileaks Diplomatic cable leaks, which were termed terror by both previous United States VP candidates, including the sitting VP Joe Biden. It has also been called terror by the current Majority Leader of the House Homeland Security Committee. This, and that both were carred by afp and other wire services are MORE than sufficient to qualify this horrible attack (what?) as terror under O Fenian's consensus. For what it's worth, I'm disturbed that this works to reduce the quality of articles on Misplaced Pages, but I note here that this is no more true than the unacceptable standard applied currently to what is/isn't terror. Trelane (talk) 07:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'd also note that every time I attempted to contact him on his talk page he simply reverted. Trelane (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Perfect! you got the reason to show why thsi doesnt work (also see the page move part), you not have the edit summaries to show his diktats and refusal. 1. WE then have grounds to go ahead with our consensus and PROVE he doesnt discuss and takes diktats. you can cite to the the admin committee his reverts.
- In addition or supplemantery tot he RFCC WP:INCIDENTS should definately work with the latest attempt to resolve.(Lihaas (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)).
- I'd also note that every time I attempted to contact him on his talk page he simply reverted. Trelane (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Right now I'm working from a Reductio_ad_absurdum basis. Based on the false Consensus that terror "must be called such by a reliable source", I have listed the Wikileaks Diplomatic cable leaks, which were termed terror by both previous United States VP candidates, including the sitting VP Joe Biden. It has also been called terror by the current Majority Leader of the House Homeland Security Committee. This, and that both were carred by afp and other wire services are MORE than sufficient to qualify this horrible attack (what?) as terror under O Fenian's consensus. For what it's worth, I'm disturbed that this works to reduce the quality of articles on Misplaced Pages, but I note here that this is no more true than the unacceptable standard applied currently to what is/isn't terror. Trelane (talk) 07:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- update: ive tried RFC. Talk:List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2011#CriteriaLihaas (talk) 20:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- strongest possible case of a tag-team army.(Lihaas (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2011 (UTC)).
- You should try assuming good faith. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 19:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- once upon a time...olive branches are continually spurned.
- anyway, Trelane, seems like the Arbcom suggestion to try other methods is failing as he/they still refuse to discuss issues and resort to threats/blackmail to get their way. Talk:List_of_armed_conflicts_and_attacks,_2011#lone_wolf_tag + yet gain:
- + more tag team evidence: (Lihaas (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)).
- You should try assuming good faith. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 19:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)