This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TransUtopian (talk | contribs) at 04:23, 6 March 2006 (How does this Current Events blurb come up as vandalism?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:23, 6 March 2006 by TransUtopian (talk | contribs) (How does this Current Events blurb come up as vandalism?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Fix your bot
Please fix your bot - see these edits: . I will block it if it continues to revert legitimate edits. Is this completely automated? I'm skeptical that reverting vandalism can ever be performed by a bot. There are many legitimate reasons for removing large amounts of content from an article. Rhobite 16:20, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Please see reply on your talk page -- Tawker 19:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Edit summaries
You should use an edit summary like "reverting probable vandalism", rather than referring to a large blanking, as clearly some edits that the bot reverts are not large blankings. JesseW, the juggling janitor 19:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- I was actually suggesting you use a non-specific edit summary; large blankings is more specific than "reverting probable vandalism"... JesseW, the juggling janitor 02:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
How does this Current Events blurb come up as vandalism?
Not my edit and PFHLai put it back in, but I'm scratching my head as to why it saw that as vandalism. TransUtopian 04:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)