Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Toddy1 (talk | contribs) at 07:41, 5 January 2012 (→January 2012: user is appealing the block, but malformed the request. So I have cut and pasted her request. I did try to explain when she made the same mistake after her last block). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Welcome to my discussion board. Last time it was cleared and archived on 1st of January 2012.

Europe

Hi, I agree with your Controversy section, and that Eastern Europe is a bogus term. The inherent problem with English Misplaced Pages is that most admins have a poor and biased understanding of its geopolitical and cultural implications, as several admins here are simple American/British teenagers with a dated/uneducated worldview: they will not support this progressive/educated view, more like oppose it. Sad but true. I avoid edit wars as they're pointless. So how can I help? ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 12:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

In fact there are two controversy sections (in Eastern Europe and Western Europe). I do recommend you the one in Western Europe which elaborated to an advanced level. I do agree with your statement: although I have no proof they are teenagers, it is very clear that their knowledge of geography and geopolitics is very poor, apparently outdated or even uneducated. The most shocking example is the guy Arcillaroja. All his arguments were... against him but he stated that no one can deny this:There is a clear difference between East and West Europe in terms of culture, language groups, social and economic standards, history, religion, racial groups, migratory movements, etc. Nobody can deny this. All these aspects are border-less in scale of Europe, however the racial groups made me disturbed. Not only because of its merit, even if we stick to the idea of races which are pretty much mixed and context-dependent but also because this statement is racist. Please note he did not have any research to support it and clearly followed the Cold War Divisions. I suggest to find other users who actually support the new division. After all, facts shall prevail. Also, we may like to find as many resources as possible in favour of the new division and add them wherever possible. This is unacceptable that people who have no resources and no appropriate education, practically rule on Misplaced Pages. The sub-division to which I am relating is: http://141.74.33.52/stagn/JordanEuropaRegional/tabid/71/Default.aspx So, would you like to ally on that matter?--Rejedef (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Rejedef (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No reason to block --Rejedef 22:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No reason to block --Rejedef 22:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No reason to block --Rejedef 22:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock