This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kylu (talk | contribs) at 01:54, 18 April 2006 (Still a stub?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:54, 18 April 2006 by Kylu (talk | contribs) (Still a stub?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Ugh... I promise guys, I'm really trying to make this page look good. It's difficult finding objective information on cellular companies sometimes. :( lilewyn 02:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- thxsomuch to Admrboltz in helping me on this. n.n I've contacted the media people at Revol briefly, will try to get some more precise information on number of users, technology, history, etc... from them. I would assume that while not necessarily "correct" the information would at least be considered a verifiable source (as per verifiability policy). Page to be updated as I get more information.
- lilewyn 00:21, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Still a stub?
"Another way to define a stub is an article so incomplete that an editor who knows little or nothing about the topic could improve its content after a superficial Internet search or a few minutes in a reference library. An article that can be improved by only a rather knowledgeable editor, or after significant research, may not be a stub." - WP:Stub
So, since it can't be improved in content after a "superficial internet search or a few minutes in a reference library" does that mean it's not a stub anymore, or does it still qualify? I'd like to remove stub cellular companies and convert them into "real" articles.