This is an old revision of this page, as edited by May122013 (talk | contribs) at 04:24, 19 July 2013 (→NOW arrticle). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:24, 19 July 2013 by May122013 (talk | contribs) (→NOW arrticle)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Biography: Politics and Government Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Canada: Toronto / Politics Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||
|
from Vfd
On 18 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Doug Holyday for a record of the discussion.
NOW arrticle
FYI, the statement about Holyday being nominated as Toronto's worst councillor is tied to the previous sentences. Therefore it doesn't stand on its own but provides context for Holyday's 'voting record'. While the article doesn't specifically call him 'Toronto's worst councillor' it does put him at the top of a top ten list of the worst councillors and labels him as 'Public Enenmy Number One'. IMO that's enough to label him as the worst councillor. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
That is a matter of opinion from a tabloid, this is not like the academic ranking of Historical rankings of United States Presidents. GoldDragon (talk) 01:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- You are correct to note that Now Magazine's ranking of the 10 Worst Councillors in Toronto is not an academic listing. This, however, is quite beside the point. It's a journalistic ranking, and is suitable for inclusion in the article accordingly. CJCurrie (talk) 04:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- A tabloid ranking is not suitable for inclusion, period. GoldDragon (talk) 16:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- NOW Magazine is hardly a tabloid. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 16:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with GoldDragon so since this is a BLP and we have no consensus for it to remin in I wil remove it for the time being. Even if it were to be in the article, since it does not specifically say he's the worst then we certainly should not be synthesizing that conclusion. NOW's claim is really not a notable assessment, more like a smear, it seems to me. May122013 (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Canada-related articles
- Mid-importance Canada-related articles
- Stub-Class Toronto articles
- High-importance Toronto articles
- Stub-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- Mid-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages