Talk:Das Liebesverbot - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RexxS (talk | contribs) at 18:32, 5 August 2013 (→Infobox/template: the advantages of an infobox in this article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:32, 5 August 2013 by RexxS (talk | contribs) (→Infobox/template: the advantages of an infobox in this article)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Richard Wagner

This article falls within the scope of the Richard Wagner WikiProject, a collaboration to develop articles on the composer and his operas. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!Richard WagnerWikipedia:WikiProject Richard WagnerTemplate:WikiProject Richard WagnerRichard Wagner

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Misplaced Pages articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox/template

As at Goetterdaemmerung, I am reverting to the previous template the infobox here, the institution of which in politeness might have been discussed with the Opera and/or Wagner projects and with the main contributing editors to the article. As that wasn't undertaken, it can be carried out now on the talk page, here, and I an notifying the projects concerned.--Smerus (talk) 19:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Can you explain in simple terms why an infobox relating to the work in question is replaced with a generic pciture of Wagner, which apart from the fact that he wrote the piece has nothing to do with the details of the work in question? Agathoclea (talk) 21:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Nobody has to ask projects or other editors for permission to edit articles. That's ownership. If you don't have any good reason why an infobox should not be added to this article, then please cease your disruptive reverting - another clear manifestation of ownership issues. I've reverted your damaging edit. --RexxS (talk) 00:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

What is it with these opera nav boxes in the top? Navboxes should be at the bottom. Infoboxes at the top as a nice summary of the article. I agree with Rexx here. PumpkinSky talk 00:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Nice to see the guys from the sogennante Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement coming out to hammer home their objectives. I won't re-revert, of course, but I still await any justification for the infobox. A reasoned discussion, as opposed to just preferring a picture, would be nice.--Smerus (talk) 07:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I've restored the long-standing Composer navbox, which is used consistently for all of Wagner's operas. --Robert.Allen (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I agree; can we then remove the largely redundant template {{Richard Wagner}}? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I have no connection with QAI, so I refute that particular lie, but I will explain to you that the infobox provides a quickly accessible overview of key facts in the article. It not only provides facts for any reader wanting that brief overview, but it also provides microformats that make the information available for reusers in a standard way, such as "vevent" and "dtstart". In addition, the standardised layout of label-data pairs enables researchers to extract that data from the article far more accurately. By making the information available to broader audiences without predetermining who should be reading or using our content, we improve the article. Readers expect this sort of information to be available, rather than a hidden list of navigation links, which have no place at the top of an article. The argument for consistency with other operas is merely an argument for consistent mediocrity - any and all of those opera articles would be improved by the addition of a well-crafted infobox. Now, please either engage with the arguments presented and quit the ad hominems or revert the damage you've done to this article. --RexxS (talk) 18:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Synopsis

The synopsis section of this article was a very lengthy verbatim quote (and unattributed) from Wagner's 'Mein Leben' in the Ellis translation, and thus not acceptable as content for a Misplaced Pages article. I have therefore deleted it and it therefore needs to be rewritten.--Smerus (talk) 19:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Do you suppose this could be replaced with an Infobox? --Robert.Allen (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Is this version from 10 August 2005 more acceptable? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Categories: