Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dmatteng (talk | contribs) at 15:36, 8 April 2014 (→Size of the picture). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Advertising

This article reads as a plain promo article about some set of speakers with overly detailed information. With the author massively waving with policies and canvassing all around, I have severe doubt that the author is truly independent and not an involved but undeclared employee. The Banner talk 13:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

In my opinion the advertising tag should be removed per consensus at the AfD that the article is not promotional. Dmatteng (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

The opinions are does sound somewhat promotional and the article is not so blatantly promotional as to be considered unsalvageable. That means that they think the article is promotional but when you deliver an effort it can be saved. The Banner talk 01:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

The editor user:The Banner has nominated this article for deletion, was blocked for disruptive editing with his appeal denied in a largely unrelated incident (though I have commented on his noted incivility during his block discussion); and he has expressed no interest in improving the article. Dmatteng (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

There was no incivility from my side, you just don't want to hear criticism on your spammy article. Plus a lot of canvassing and personal attacks. Please stop with that. The Banner talk 14:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Size of the picture

I have reduced the size of the picture (in fact, halved it). The main reason is that the picture was excessively big and taking the attention away from the text. As pictures in infoboxes are usually used to give a quick view of the subject, there is no need for this size. The present, 100 px, size is big enough to give readers a good view at the looks of the speakers. When they want more detail, they can double click on the picture for the full size.

Beside that, the big sized picture gave the article a promotional look. The Banner talk 20:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

200px is the size used in HTC One GA article.Dmatteng (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• Unassessed Technology articles
• WikiProject Technology articles
• Unassessed Brands articles
• Unknown-importance Brands articles
• WikiProject Brands articles