Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gouncbeatduke (talk | contribs) at 16:13, 11 September 2014 (→User:Infantom). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Gouncbeatduke, you are invited on a Misplaced Pages Adventure!

Hi Gouncbeatduke!! You're invited: learn how to edit Misplaced Pages in under an hour. Hope to see you there! Play The Misplaced Pages Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Israel. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.

Keep in mind that Israel is subject to a one-revert rule. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 19:15, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

actually, I did one (1) revert of an editor who had violated the 24-hour revert rule with two (2) reverts. The fact you have claimed that I am edit warring and not him shows you do not have a NPOV. Gouncbeatduke (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I didn't notice that another editor had violated the 1RR rule as well. I've warned the other editor as well. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 19:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for deciding to eventually warn the editor who actually violated 24-hour one revert rule. As I stated before, I only did one revert, so I did not violate the rule. Gouncbeatduke (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Infantom

Hi, I've deleted the declaration of sockpuppetry you left at User:Infantom because you offered no evidence and no sockpuppetry investigation has been initiated. If you believe a user is a sock, the appropriate course of action is to bring matter to the Sockpuppet investigations page, but you will be expected to provide evidence to back up the claims. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 20:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know about the Sockpuppet investigation page. I will read the page an attempt to open and investigation. Gouncbeatduke (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 --NeilN 02:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)