Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jiang

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nickshanks (talk | contribs) at 21:26, 6 October 2004 (happy happy happy!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:26, 6 October 2004 by Nickshanks (talk | contribs) (happy happy happy!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Note: Unless you specify that you will be monitoring this page, I will respond to you on your talk page instead of mine. But if you want a speedier response or any response at all, answer on this page since I will probably forget to check yours.

POST A COMMENT

Archived versions: 18VIII03 | 21X03 | 30XII03 | 21II04 | 17IV04 | 07VI04 | 28VII04 | 2X04


happy happy happy!

frankly speaking, i don't really understand what those pieces of sentences/words mean... sound weird to me, took me a long time (maybe more than a month) to figure that out! what kind of promotion of nationalism is that? (just curious) >.< --Yacht (talk) 11:33, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)

US space programme

Hi there. I would like some clarification on 'programme' vs. 'program' here. I and my dictionary are both of the opinion that the two words have very different meanings and are not interchangable, as Rmhermen appears to claim. He then contradicts his own interpretation of WP policy by moving one of my pages. Could you please comment on User_talk:Rmhermen#Programme. As for the page on the US space programme, the NASA page does not come close to covering what I want. It only discusses one organisation, my page will cover contractor's involvements, and government decisions affecting the direction more than NASA itself. Please wait until I have fleshed it out and written the other articles over the next week or so before suggesting it be merged with something else. Thanks for listening, your input would be appreciated. Nicholas 21:13, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)