This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Armbrust (talk | contribs) at 12:55, 3 January 2015 (Archiving 1 requests (0 approved: 1 declined)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:55, 3 January 2015 by Armbrust (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 requests (0 approved: 1 declined))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Requests for permissions | |
|---|---|
| Common | |
| Uncommon | |
| Logs | |
| Special | |
Autopatrolled
ShortcutsUser:Erutuon
- Erutuon (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
- I've created 62 non-redirect articles and 146 redirects, primarily on topics relating to linguistics and botany. My record in following policy regarding notability has been good, and according to X!'s list, all but three of the articles I created remain (and the only one that actually seems to have stayed deleted is a duplicate). I'm not creating articles at as high a rate as I used to, but at least my track record should qualify me for autopatrolled. — Eru·tuon 01:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
User:Giso6150
- Giso6150 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
- The quality of my 45 articles (and my hundreds of other edits and contributions) has been consistently good and continues to improve. The type of projects that I most enjoy—creating stub articles for notable topics related to São Paulo—often yields a small flood of new articles in a short period of time. Still, only my very first article (in 2012) was ever disputed… I really do have a knack for this! I believe that I’ve demonstrated that I understand the importance of using categories, templates, references, and proper formatting in the articles that I create. Autopatrolling my humble stubs would help free up time for others to devote to trickier, messier pages. giso6150 (talk) 03:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Not done. Good work but almost all one-line stubs that do not demonstrate a broad knowledge of notability or MoS. Of the three or four full length articles one BLP is borderline notable. It won't take the patrollers long to review your articles so do apply again when you have reached nearer the default 50 full articles that would not attract the attention of the reviewers. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
User:Pdfpdf
- Pdfpdf (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
- Per User talk:Pdfpdf#WP:RFP/A, (viz: Having just patrolled a few of your new pages I'm struck by how dumb it is to be checking the contribution of someone with 3 times my experience. Please apply for Autopatrolled and save us from pointless work. Happy New Year. Bazj (talk) 12:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)), I would feel very guilty if I did not apply. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)