This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) at 10:23, 20 February 2015 (Undid revision 648018560 by Fallenangelius (talk) Unsourced, WP:You violation.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:23, 20 February 2015 by Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 648018560 by Fallenangelius (talk) Unsourced, WP:You violation.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) This redirect is about an alternative theory of mind power. For mainstream philosophical discussion of the intellect, see nous. For the Oxford dons of the 19th century, see Oriel Noetics. For other uses, see Noesis (disambiguation).This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Noetics" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In philosophy, noetics is a branch of metaphysical philosophy concerned with the study of mind and intellect. Noetic topics include the doctrine of the agent/patient intellect (Aristotle, Averroes) and the doctrine of the Divine Intellect (Plotinus).
Contemporary use
Since the 1970s the term "noetics" has been employed by several authors like Dan Brown in The Lost Symbol and others who write about consciousness and spirituality.
The Institute of Noetic Sciences proposes noetic sciences as "how beliefs, thoughts, and intentions affect the physical world".
Many TV and film creations, such as Fringe and the X-men film series, have adapted the concepts of "noetic sciences" into creating fantasy and soft science fiction entertainment.
See also
- Traditional philosophy
- Consciousness studies
- Alternative philosophy and parapsychology
- New Thought
- Integral thought and Ken Wilber
- Institute of Noetic Sciences and Christian de Quincey
- Noosphere
- Panpsychism
- Technoetic
- Classical Psychology
References
- Daniel D. De Haan (2010). "Aristotle's De Anima: A Common Point of Departure for Averroistic and Thomistic Noetics?".
- Richard T. Wallis. Neoplatonism and Gnosticism. SUNY Press, 1992, p. 99ff.
- Institute of Noetic Sciences. <http://www.noetic.org/>
Further reading
- Davidson, H.A., Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect. Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Kenny, Anthony, Aquinas on Mind, Routledge, 1994.
- Brentano, Franz, Sensory and Noetic Consciousness: Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint III, International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
- de Quincey, C., Radical Knowing: Understanding Consciousness through Relationship, Rochester, VT: Park Street Press, 2005.
- Frankl, V., "Man's Search for Meaning", Beacon Press, 2006.
External links
- The dictionary definition of noetic at Wiktionary
This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |