Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Motions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guerillero (talk | contribs) at 23:05, 13 September 2015 (post motions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:05, 13 September 2015 by Guerillero (talk | contribs) (post motions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Motion: Overlap of Sanctions 13 September 2015
Motion: Removal of Unused Sanctions 13 September 2015
Motion: New Religious Movements 23 October 2014
Motion: Liancourt Rocks 13 September 2015

Motions

Shortcuts

This page can be used by arbitrators to propose motions not related to any existing case or request. Motions are archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Motions.

Only arbitrators may propose or vote on motions on this page. You may visit WP:ARC or WP:ARCA for potential alternatives.

Make a motion (Arbitrators only)

You can make comments in the sections called "community discussion" or in some cases only in your own section. Arbitrators or clerks may summarily remove or refactor any comment.

Motion: Overlap of Sanctions

To prevent confusion and overlap between existing sanctions,

  1. Remedy 2 of the Bluemarine case is rescinded. The discretionary sanctions authorised for the American Politics 2 case and the Editing of Biographies of Living Persons case continue to apply in this topic area;
  2. Remedy 2.1 of the Election case is rescinded. The discretionary sanctions authorised for the American Politics 2 case continue to apply in this topic area;
  3. Remedies 4 and 5 of the Free Republic case are rescinded. The discretionary sanctions authorised for the American Politics 2 case continue to apply in this topic area;
  4. Remedy 1 of the Neuro-linguistic programming case is rescinded. The discretionary sanctions authorised for the Pseudoscience case continue to apply in this topic area;
  5. Remedy 1.1 of the Tea Party Movement case is rescinded. The discretionary sanctions authorised for the American Politics 2 case continue to apply in this topic area;
  6. Remedy 1 of the Vivaldi case is rescinded The discretionary sanctions authorised for the Editing of Biographies of Living Persons case continue to apply in this topic area;
  7. Nothing in this motion provides grounds for appeal of remedies or restrictions imposed while discretionary sanctions or article probations for the foregoing cases were in force. Such appeals or requests to lift or modify such sanctions may be made under the same terms as any other appeal.
Support
  1. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Recuse

Discussion by arbitrators

Proposed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Community comments

Motion: Removal of Unused Sanctions

Every so often, it becomes reasonable to terminate sanctions that are no longer necessary,

  1. Remedy 1 of the Lapsed Pacifist 2 case is rescinded;
  2. Remedy 2 of the Mantanmoreland case is rescinded;
  3. Remedy 1 of the Waterboarding case is rescinded;
  4. Nothing in this motion provides grounds for appeal of remedies or restrictions imposed while article probations for the foregoing cases were in force. Such appeals or requests to lift or modify such sanctions may be made under the same terms as any other appeal;
  5. In the event that disruptive editing resumes in any of these topic-areas, a request to consider reinstating discretionary sanctions in that topic-area may be made on the clarifications and amendments page.
Support
  1. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Recuse

Discussion by arbitrators

Proposed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Community comments

Motion: New Religious Movements

Due to how closely related the topic areas of several of the existing sanctions are,

  1. Remedy 3 of the Brahma Kumaris case is rescinded;
  2. The 23 October 2014 Motion to the Falun Gong case is rescinded;
  3. The 20 December 2012 Motion the Prem Rawat case is rescinded;
  4. The 1 June 2012 Motion to the Scientology case is rescinded;
  5. Remedy 7 of the Transcendental Meditation movement case is rescinded;
  6. In place of these sanctions, Standard Discretionary sanctions are authorised with immediate effect for all pages relating to post-1929 New Religious Movements and related people, broadly construed;
  7. Nothing in this motion provides grounds for appeal of remedies or restrictions imposed while discretionary sanctions or article probations for the foregoing cases were in force. Such appeals or requests to lift or modify such sanctions may be made under the same terms as any other appeal.
Support
Oppose
Abstain
Recuse

Discussion by arbitrators

This was proposed as an alternative to removing the Brahma Kumaris article probation. I added the 1930 cutoff so groups such as The Salvation Army, Quakers, Mormons, Bahá'í Faith, Apostolic Church, Opus Dei and Conservative Judaism are not placed under DS without any problems. I'm still not 100% happy with this setup because Rastafari is covered by this setup. At the same time, I know that this will solve future problems. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Community comments

Motion: Liancourt Rocks

  1. Remedy 3 of the Liancourt Rocks case is rescinded.
  2. In its place, Standard Discretionary sanctions are authorised with immediate effect for all pages relating to the Liancourt Rocks;
  3. Nothing in this motion provides grounds for appeal of remedies or restrictions imposed while the article probation for the foregoing case was in force. Such appeals or requests to lift or modify such sanctions may be made under the same terms as any other appeal.
Support
  1. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Recuse

Discussion by arbitrators

Proposed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Community comments