This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ViperSnake151 (talk | contribs) at 15:10, 9 April 2015 (Caution: Unconstructive editing on Google Toolbar and Spartan (web browser). (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:10, 9 April 2015 by ViperSnake151 (talk | contribs) (Caution: Unconstructive editing on Google Toolbar and Spartan (web browser). (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)GeoffreyT2000, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi GeoffreyT2000! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
User page
Dear GeoffreyT2000, I deleted your user page to protect your personal information. As you are a minor (in most countries) it is very important you protect your personal information. A useful guide for you to read would be WP:GFYA. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Mkdw 21:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
February 2015
Hello, I'm Codename Lisa. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Windows Virtual PC, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:First Days of Months 1900–1999
Template:First Days of Months 1900–1999 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Help requested
Hi GeoffreyT2000 - As you seem to be very knowledgeable about calendar templates, are you able to help with the problem I've flagged up here. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Apology about quick revert
I apologize for my quick revert of your edits at Dihedral group; I see there is a confusion between the use of n as the order of the group and as the index of the dihedral group that I missed. There are times when lack of an adequate explanatory edit summary leads to a "leave it like it was" response. I'll take the time over the next day or two to more carefully review the changes needed. —Quondum 19:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
{{subst:uw-disruptive2|1=Google Toolbar]] and