This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Davew123 (talk | contribs) at 12:45, 16 April 2015 (→April 2015). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:45, 16 April 2015 by Davew123 (talk | contribs) (→April 2015)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)April 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Domain Validation (email), you may be blocked from editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- In any event removing the tag will not stop the discussion or avoid the article being deleted. I have explained my reasoning, both in the proposed deletion and at the current deletion discussion. The way for you to avoid the article being deleted is to explain at the deletion discussion why my reasoning is wrong and/or to edit the article so that it no longer has the issues identified. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Dave Wain says: If you prevent me publishing online, you are a commie. If you deny I am the owner you are a fraudster. Your two-faced ethical ethnic fraud is so obvious. PS: I have forwarded your "free-press" to the real-press.
- Your being incredibly nasty as well as not really making any sense. These sorts of over-the-top emotional reactions are exactly why we discourage people from editing around subjects where they have a conflict of interest. I have endeavored to politely explain to you what is going on here but if you are going to act like this I don't believe I'll bother. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Dave Wain says: I couldn't be bothered either, other than you think that the only deserving dictators are hippies.
- I assume these are supposed to be insults based on some set of beliefs you imagine I have, but to me they are just nonsense. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Dave Wain says: you only publish articles that fit in with your fraudulent view of the world. No wonder the EU is investigating you, Google and WikiLeaks Davew123 (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Dave Wain says so the moderator thinks that anyone can write a patent. Try it. Then another comment like you can't cite patents because the source isn't reputable. Guess he/she must have an ugly daughter.
The existing entry for Domain Validation doesn't make any sense and does not have any references. How did that get approved? My entry is the correct definition with a fully granted patent to back it up. Davew123 (talk) 12:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)