Misplaced Pages

User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 04:36, 9 November 2015 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad/Archive 2) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:36, 9 November 2015 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad/Archive 2) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

There is no Cabal

Welcome! Feel free to leave a message at the bottom, and I'll get back to you. If you're angry and stressed, try listening to this while composing your comment.

vn-6This user talk page has been vandalized 6 times.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.
 If you feel that I have made a mistake of any kind, please let me know. I do make mistakes, and I am happy to talk it out. Uncivil comments will end up in my "Fun Insult Userboxes" section. GAB
Due to increased obligations, my daily Wikitime will be curtailed for the foreseeable future. GAB

MURICA4LIFE

Vandal
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

NOT VANDALISM

I am so sowwy my fwiend

Cardinal Sarah

Hi GeneralizationsAreBad,

This Misplaced Pages entry misrepresents Cardinal Sarah's position: "He is also a critic of... growth of LGBT rights" The term "growth of LGBT rights" is not used by Cardinal Sarah, but is projected by the editor. This misrepresentation betrays a bias that violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and amounts to slander.

I corrected the misrepresentation by replacing it with the Cardinal's direct quote in question, and provided a source.

Thanks, CR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cr7777777 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much for getting back to me. I appreciate it. I agree that the talk page is the best place to deal with this issue. Hopefully, we can work out a solution rather than continuing to edit-war. GAB 15:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
No problem. In the meantime we should keep the cardinal's direct quote until this is sorted out. Ezium23 and Mean as custard had used the direct quote as well before Contaldo80 modified it with his own wording. Cr7777777 (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Attack pages

Hi. When you get an attack page like the one just now, {{db-attack}} is a better tag than {{db-vandalism}}. It automatically blanks the page, puts it in a high-priority queue for admin attention, and generates a suitably fierce message for the author. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Thanks. I typically do, but I guess I just didn't for some reason this time. GAB 20:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
No worries! I pointed it out because some people aren't aware of it. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)