Talk:User experience - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 15:42, 23 January 2016 (Archiving 4 discussions to Talk:User experience/Archives/2013. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:42, 23 January 2016 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 4 discussions to Talk:User experience/Archives/2013. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human–Computer Interaction (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Systems: Systems engineering Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Merge User experience with Quality of Experience?

It has been suggested that UX and QoE pages should be merged. I do not support this idea. While QoE is related to UX, both terms are in use and used a bit differently. The current description of UX is about using an interactive system, while the description of QoE seems to be covering a wider area of all touch points between a customer and a company. In this sense, QoE is closer to Customer experience than User experience. -- VirpiRoto (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Totally incorrect merge suggestion IMO. I'm amazed the suggestion has survived this long. QoE is more of an engineering term trying to quantify things, I'm not sure I've ever actually heard it used by any UX/HCI professionals. --99.152.9.49 (talk) 16:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

They are totally different concepts around the same central theme. The quality of the experience is what is measured by a User Experience Engineer. It would be similar to trying to put a ruler in the same category as length. RonUSMC (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Disagree slightly different concepts QoE being also similar to QoS Widefox; talk 14:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Agree UX and QoE should not be merged because each is a big subject. These are fields of research and industry that apply to a broad range of information technology hardware and software. JohnPritchard (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Categories: