Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Claudioalv (talk | contribs) at 06:25, 12 February 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Claudioalv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here ] (]) 06:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here ] (]) 06:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here ] (]) 06:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I disagree with that reason as I have never used multiple accounts. However, Misplaced Pages information team (info-en@wikipedia.org) kindly explained me that reason: "The evidence used to determine sockpuppetry relies on technical data regarding the editors connections to the Misplaced Pages site as well as behavioural evidence regarding similarity in editing of content, language, tone and several over factors.

The information that would have had to be similar to draw this conclusion is quite lengthy. Your options would be to either request the exact edits you wish to make along with sources to confirm these or to provide explanation to the similarities in technical and non-technical similarities to the other accounts or IP address ranges that have been used to carry out the same pattern of editing previously." I have already clarified to Misplaced Pages info, Misplaced Pages legal counsel, user "only", user "JzG" Beeblebrox (English Misplaced Pages Administrator) the reasons for my edit. No one seems to address the issue I raised so far. Moreover user "JzG" and user "only" blocked my account as a "clear case of sockpuppetry" even if I have never user multiple accounts, I registered few days ago and I posted my first post two days ago. Misplaced Pages information team advised me that "if you would be willing to provide these changes and links to evidence them I would be wiling to review and amend as necessary (within the bounds of policy) the article in question". At this point, if Misplaced Pages does not want to review my block I am fine with that (this case is showing that WIkipedia Enclicopedia is not so free as it is stated in its policy), but at least I kindly request they remove the misleading link and take into consideration my requests on the grounds of verifiable and external sources and links I have already provided them and I am providing them again in this further appeal. My question is: Why does Misplaced Pages EGS article host on a misleading external link which does not have anything to do with the Michigan Department of Education? The current information is based on a link of Arab British Accademy for Higher Education and does not come from Michigan Department of Education. In particular, by reading the EGS Misplaced Pages article: "The State of Michigan Civil Service Commission states that degrees from the EGS "will not be accepted...to satisfy educational requirements indicated on job specifications". This statement is based on the external link that does not have anything to do with the Michigan state. Indeed, the official Michigan state website is the following: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/Non-accreditedSchools_78090_7.pdf. By clicking on that link, does not appear the EGS as a non-accredited school. Therefore, the current information contained on Misplaced Pages is inaccurate. I politely request Misplaced Pages users, administrators, JzG, Only, and Misplaced Pages Staff to check this information. In conclusion I am requesting not to "change X to Y", but to remove X (The State of Michigan Civil Service Commission states that degrees from the EGS "will not be accepted...to satisfy educational requirements indicated on job specifications").

Moreover, I request that the current "Accreditation in the United States" would be removed for the following reasons. European Graduate School is currently accredited in the European Union. This contribution con be verified at the following link: http://www.ncfhe.org.mt/news-item/the-european-graduate-school-accredited-by-the-ncfhe-239370240/. In addition, European Graduate School is a European University (and not a U.S. School). In other words, applicant students are aware they are applying to a European University, therefore is not correct that the majority of information contained on Misplaced Pages is based on a U.S. Accreditation. Lastly, I do not find correct the the article contain the following information: "degrees from the EGS are not currently recognized by many state education authorities in the United States". In fact, only two States appear to not recognize them, meanwhile no reference to the remaining 48 States is made. I assume that 48 States recognize EGS degrees so it is not correct that information. Therefore, please change X in Y Claudioalv (talk) 06:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Claudioalv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

Clear case of sockpuppetry based on previous accounts with the same edits. only (talk) 01:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I do not well understand the reason why I was blocket. I think that is unfair that the article cannot be edit anymore and the inaccurate information are presently guiding the Misplaced Pages users. I provided three different external links to support my edit and the consequences was JzG blocked me. If the best way is to work with the Misplaced Pages community, as Misplaced Pages staff advised me, to be polite and to mantain a friendly discussion, the JzG's behavior is not understandable. Again, there is a misleading link related to a State of Michigan :</ref> http://www.abahe.co.uk/Non-accreditedSchools_78090_7.pdf</ref>". That link is from the Arab British Academy for Higher Education and it is inaccurate to refer it as a Michigan Department of Education official statement. By posting this information, JzG has blocked me rather than address the issue. It is my fist time I edit something on wikipedia and I have never used multiple accounts. Instead of blocking people, volunteer administrators should verify the information contained on Misplaced Pages. thanks. ClaudioalvClaudioalv (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock