Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bishonen (talk | contribs) at 23:49, 16 August 2016 (Discretionary sanctions alert). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for your this edit on Desi daru which helped article to improve in some manner. Cheers! -- Human3015  01:25, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

I am worried about your health, wishing you the best of luck. I hope that you return to Misplaced Pages soon. Faizan (talk) 07:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Thankyou for your kind words. I am sure this beer will get me on my feet pretty soon:). All I miss, now that I am unable to edit, is the fun one can have in editing this wonderful encyclopedia and contribute for its betterment.—TripWire  10:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, Once again Thanks for the Information and I think that was about you .HIAS (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

@Hitch Hicking Across Sahara: That was threat. I think Human3015 is all set to e-punch you :) —TripWire  05:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

WP:TEAMWORK

HIAS (talk) 20:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Even I have not recieved your previous mail. I think there is some problem with my wiki Email feature. HIAS (talk) 03:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Dude, you need to change you email client :D. I am able to send and receive mails from other editors, even some blocked sock-masters .—TripWire  09:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Issue Resolved, You can Check your Mail .HIAS (talk) 08:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Harassment

Hy there @Future Perfect at Sunrise:. Just wanted to request if you can stop him from harassing me again and again, please? The ban you placed me on ended on 3 Jan '16 (3 months ago). Even before that and especially since I became active again, I have been editing more articles not related to my ban, but he will just not let it go. Instead, he is again trying the old tactics of harassment and hounding. Thanks—TripWire  02:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Sigh. I'm not "harassing" you. You just jumped right back into the kind of edits and behavior which led to your ban in the first place. I'm just pointing that out.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:28, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Out of the 100 edits I made since 30 January 2016 (a month after my ban ended) only two (, ) were on the topic related to my ban, but you come barging in accusing me of 'jumping right back into the kind of edits and behavior which led to your ban in the first place'?? That's outright harassment, sir! Instead of discussing the issue at the talk pages and resolving the matter, you did nothing but harassed me by hurling allegations. —TripWire  03:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

One more time. You are again reverting to exactly the kind of behavior that led to your topic ban in the first place. Also, weren't you under a 1RR restriction? Volunteer Marek (talk) 01:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

One more time, you are drastically wrong.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   20:32, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Indo Pak 1965 war

I have been observing the activity of MBlaze rather suspiciously on different articles, Indo-Pak 1965 war being one of them. Can he be nominated for a block for being a POV pusher? ThanksDelusionMBT (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for approaching me, but as you know at Misplaced Pages our activities are not hidden, so everyone can form an opinion regarding another editor. If you think, and its your own opinion, that the person in question is a POV pusher, you may take the matter to ANI. Here I will also suggest that you should refrain from approaching other editors regarding the conduct of editors you may be in conflict with as it is undesirable. Instead you may ping an Admin for the same. WP:CANVASS clearly forbids this. Thanks—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   18:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you trip wire, it surely is a learning experience for me can you please tell me how can I take the matter to ANI?DelusionMBT (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

I see that you have been subjected to an SPI. If that's what you are planning to report, I'd suggest that if you are not a sock, you should relax as it's within everyone's right to initiate an investigation if he/she has credible evidence. You can raise your concerns at the SPI though.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   20:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the help and your response. DelusionMBT (talk) 11:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Sock users D4iNa4 and Mblaze trap!

Be warned banned socks are targeting you my friend and they have the admins on their side this time I suggest you also file spi against the already well known socker D4iNa4 aka YogeshKhandke hes back to his edit war ways anyway so find a neutral admin and report his pov edit wars. Ever since the socker Mblaze was exposed the Indian pov pushers have gone crazy. Good luck! 2.125.124.55 (talk) 10:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Sleeper accounts such as Capitals00 are also suddenly voting for your to get topic banned. Just file a counter request and get them topic banned. 2.125.124.55 (talk) 10:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Kashmir conflict restrictions

Please see Talk:Kashmir_conflict#Editing_Restrictions--regentspark (comment) 17:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Right sir!—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   17:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Kulbhushan Yadav‎

Hi TW, I was not focussing on the merits of the arguments or individual behavior, rather it was just a reminder to not get carried away by reverting each other like before. I certainly didn’t mean to target you or mean any disrespect. I hope you take it in the spirit it was intended. Cheers. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

I really appreciate your concern. Thankyou—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   23:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Purple Barnstar
		Its hard to name one page because your contributions are exceptional across the board but I have been watching the recent edit history of Balochistan conflict and kudos to you for standing up against bullying, POV pushing and tag-teaming. Thanks for upholding the neutral values of Misplaced Pages against this onslaught. I wish that I had more time at hand to help improve that page further which I intend to do some day. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 06:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Thankyou @SheriffIsInTown: for this support, I needed it. .—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   01:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Translation

Hi, would you be able to translate what it says in this image? The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Sure. "Mrs Hijab Imtiaz Ali. You were the first Muslim woman who received flying certification."—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   10:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 10:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Eid Mubarak!

Eid Mubarak! آپ کو اور آپ کے گھر والوں کو دل کی اتھاہ گہرائیوں سے عید کی خوشیاں بہت بہت مبارک۔

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Thankyou so very much. Khair Mubarik.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   13:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement Request

Please see the AE Request regarding you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

BSO

Hello, please note that, as an administrative matter, I have partially reverted your latest edit , as the largest bit of text that it reinserted was clearly not "sock-free" as you described it, but had been originally inserted by yet another sock . That paragraph was also quite openly tendentious, in poor English, sourced to an unreliable blog, and DS was probably right about one thing at least, there were copyvio passages in it, so I'd ask you not to reinstate it further. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Thankyou for that, sir. I were to do it myself but got busy with filing the SPI. The article is otherwise poorly sourced, with blogs et al, will try to improve.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   21:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Future Perfect at Sunrise: Sir, I have added some links/ref as suggested, also made minor changes without affecting the overall context of the section. Please review it if you like.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   23:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Kautilya and Darknesshines

The above user seems to but in and push a pro Indian pov by manipulating wiki policy he has added Indian pov to Pakistan related articles. I think their needs to be a discussion of his POV and possible topic ban on Balochistan and Pakistan related articles. He also uses socks to create disruption on articles then hides behind policy of "taking responsibility" its a vicious cycle of sock edits and Kautilya backing them once they get blocked. Take this to ARB. 141.241.26.20 (talk) 11:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are topic banned from all Balochistan related articles, broadly construed, for three months. Additionally, you are placing on an aspersions restriction: any attempt to bring the purported or deduced or imagined ethnic or nationality identities of any users will lead to an immediate block. This includes an editor's own stated ethnic identity or nationality.

You have been sanctioned As a result of this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 11:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Ouch! .—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡   15:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Make your case on the talk page

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Article. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

@Worldbruce: Sir, there is no case. Removal of longstanding / sourced content, as was being done , constitutes vandalism. Instead, improving and building WP (by adding sources) is what we should be doing. Thankyou.

Inexplicable caution

Hi TripWire, can you explain why you issued this caution to me? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 17:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Template:Z33

• This is merely a reminder. I rather think you're aware of the discretionary sanctions, but I see it's over a year since you were alerted to them. Bishonen | talk 23:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC).