This is an old revision of this page, as edited by VQuakr (talk | contribs) at 04:27, 3 February 2017 (→Adriatica McKinney, Texas: d?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:27, 3 February 2017 by VQuakr (talk | contribs) (→Adriatica McKinney, Texas: d?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Adriatica McKinney, Texas
AfDs for this article:- Adriatica McKinney, Texas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of passing WP:GNG. Also appears to be a recreation of previously deleted material... Zackmann08 (/What I been doing) 17:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This article is a recreation of a previously deleted title, yet the content is different. This page may not pass WP:GNG regardless, but it is not eligible for WP:G4. Garchy (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Garchy: is it possible for you to restore the deleted content for us non-admins to view? Perhaps to the talk page of the article or a draft space? Would be helpful for comparison. --Zackmann08 (/What I been doing) 18:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- What would be the point? IIRC there was nothing salvageable in the previous version, and an admin has already declined a G4 nomination. VQuakr (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Garchy: is it possible for you to restore the deleted content for us non-admins to view? Perhaps to the talk page of the article or a draft space? Would be helpful for comparison. --Zackmann08 (/What I been doing) 18:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Leaning towards delete - the "Time Money" bit on Youtube isn't an interview, it's just a paid spot of the creator plugging his product. That leaves several cites to D Magazine, which is probably too local in coverage to pass the intellectual independence requirement of the GNG. That leaves a different and very short news blurb from 2009 and as noted in the last AfD, the Croatian source is mostly quotes of press releases. VQuakr (talk) 04:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)