Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 195.220.102.29 (talk) at 19:22, 3 October 2006 (→External links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A necktie (usually just called a tie) is a long piece of material worn around the neck and under a collar with a knot tied in front. The modern necktie, along with the ascot and the bow tie, are all descended from the cravat. They are mainly worn by men, though they are sometimes worn by women, either as fashionable dress wear, to office work - or as part of a uniform (e.g. military).

Cravat

A cravat is the neckband that was the forerunner of the modern tailored necktie. From the end of the 16th century, the term "band" applied to any long strip of cloth worn round the neck that was not a "ruff". The ruff itself had started its career in the earlier 16th century as a starched and pleated strip of white linen that could be freshly changed to keep the neck of a doublet from getting increasingly grimy, or for use as a bib or napkin. A "band" could indicate a plain, attached shirt collar or a detached "falling band" that draped over the doublet collar.

The modern form of the cravat originated in the 1630s. Like most male fashions between the 17th century and World War I, it had a military origin. During the reign of Louis XIII of France, Croatian mercenaries were enlisted in a regiment that supported the King and Richelieu against the Duc de Guise and the Queen Mother, Marie de Medici. The traditional outfit of these Croats aroused curiosity in Paris on account of the unusual and picturesque scarves distinctively tied about their necks. The scarves were made of various cloths, ranging from coarse material for common soldiers, to fine linen and silk for officers. The word "cravat" comes from the French cravate, and many sources state that this is a corruption of "Croat" — Croatian "Hrvat". However there is evidence that the word was in use in France in the 14th century and in Italy in 16th century. In one of his ballads, the French writer Eustache Deschamps (c. 1340–1407), used the phrase "faites restraindre sa cravate" (pull his cravat tighter). Considering the interdependency of many European regions (particularly the French) with the Venetian Empire, and the fact that this empire at one time occupied the bulk of the Croatian coast, that type of cross-culturalization would not be unprecedented. Whatever the origin of the word, the new form of dress became known as a cravate and the French were quite ready to give up the starched linen ruffs that they had been wearing and adopt the new fashion of loose cravates made of linen or muslin with broad edges of lace.

On his return to England from exile in 1660, Charles II brought with him this new word in fashion:

"A cravatte is another kind of adornment for the neck being nothing else but a long towel put about the Collar, and so tyed before with a Bow Knott; this is the original of all such Wearings; but now by the Art and Inventions of the seamsters, there is so many new ways of making them, that it would be a task to name, much more to describe them". (Randle Holme, Academy of Armory and Blazon, 1688.)

A gentleman's cravat would be made of fine lace. Grinling Gibbons the famous carver and sculptor, made a highly realistic one, carved out of a piece of white limewood.

During the wars of Louis XIV of 1689–1697, the flowing cravat was replaced, except for court occasions, by the more current and equally military Steinkirk, named after the Battle of Steenkerque in 1692. The Steinkirk was a long narrow, plain or lightly trimmed neckcloth worn with military dress, wrapped just once about the neck in a loose knot, with a lace of fringed ends that were twisted together and tucked out of the way into the button-hole (of either a coat or a waistcoat) The steinkirk proved to be popular with both men and women until the 1720s.

The macaronis reintroduced the flowing cravat in the 1770s and the manner of tying one became a matter of personal taste and style, to the extent that after Waterloo, the neckwear itself was increasingly referred to as a "tie".

Tie variants

The cravat also spawned the following variants which are still worn today:

• 19th century: Bow tie; the process of the cravat changing into the bow was gradual, and a definite line is difficult to draw.
• 1850s: Four-in-hand, see below; also known as the "long tie", it is the variety most people mean when they just say "tie".
• 1880s: Ascot tie.
• 1940s: Bola tie (also called a string tie or bolo tie); a tie from the Southwest United States consisting of a cord with a clasp.

Four-in-hand

The four-in-hand tie became fashionable in Britain in the 1850s. Early ties were simple rectangular strips of cloth cut on the square with square ends. The name four-in-hand originally described a carriage with four horses and one driver. Later it became the name of a gentlemen's club in London. Some reports state that the carriage drivers tied their reins with a four-in-hand knot (see below) whilst others claim that the carriage drivers wore their scarves in the manner of a four-in-hand, but the most likely explanation is that members of the club began to wear the neckwear, making it fashionable. In the latter half of the 19th century, the four-in-hand knot and the four-in-hand tie were synonymous. As stiff collars gave way to soft turned-down collars the four-in-hand gained popularity. With its increasing dominance, the term four-in-hand fell out of usage and it was simply called a "long tie" or a "tie".

In 1926, Jesse Langsdorf from New York introduced ties cut on the bias (US) or cross-grain (UK) which allowed the tie to fall evenly from the knot without twisting; this also caused any woven pattern such as stripes to appear diagonally across the tie.

There are four main knots used. The simplest, the four-in-hand knot, is probably used by the vast majority of tie wearers. The others (in order of difficulty) are the Pratt knot (also known as the Shelby knot), the half-Windsor knot, and the Windsor knot (also known erroneously as the double-Windsor). The Windsor knot is the thickest knot among the four since it involves the greatest number of steps. The Windsor knot is named after the Duke of Windsor, although he is not the inventor and he did not use it. The Duke did favour a thick knot but he achieved this result by having ties specially made of thicker material. In the late 1990s, two researchers, Thomas Fink and Yong Mao of Cambridge University's Cavendish Laboratory, used mathematical modelling to discover that it is possible to tie 85 different knots (within the normal constraints of how a tie should be worn) with a conventional tie. They found that in addition to the four well-known knots, six other knots produced aesthetically pleasing results.

Today, four-in-hand ties are part of the formal clothing of males in both Western and non-Western societies, particularly in business. They have also found their way into the outfits of fashionably trail blazing females.

Four-in-hand ties are generally made from silk or cotton. They appear in an unlimited array of colors and patterns, notably striped (diagonally) and paisley.

It is thought by some psychologists that the wearing of a long tie is a subconscious effort by a male to draw females' eyes down towards the male genitalia.

Clip-on ties

For more information on clip-on ties see: Clip-On ties

The clip-on tie is a tie (bow tie or four in hand) which is permanently tied into its knot, and which is fixed only to the front of the shirt collar by a metal clip. It is primarily a 20th-century innovation.

Ties as signs of membership

The use of coloured and patterned ties to indicate the wearer's membership of a club, military regiment, school, etc., goes back no further than late-nineteenth century England. The first definite occurrence is in 1880, when Exeter College, Oxford rowers took the College-colour ribbons from their straw boaters and wore them as neckties (tied four-in-hand). They went on to order a proper set of ties in the same colours, thus creating the first example of a College tie.

It did not take long for other colleges, as well as schools, universities, and clubs to follow suit. At about the same time, the British military moved from dressing in bright and distinctive colours to wearing more subdued, discreet, and practical uniforms. They retained the old uniforms for dress occasions, but also continued to use their regimental colours and emblems on embroidered blazer badges and ties.

The most common pattern for such ties was and remains diagonal stripes in alternating colours (running down the tie from the left in the U.K. and most of Europe, rather than the U.S. preference for stripes running down from the right); the alternative is either a single emblem or crest placed centrally and designed to appear where a tiepin would normally be, or a repeated pattern of such motifs. Sometimes both types are used by an organisation, either simply to offer a choice or to indicate a distinction between types or levels of membership. Occasionally a hybrid is used, in which alternating stripes of colour are overlaid by a pattern of repeated motifs.

Many British schools use variations on their basic tie to indicate the age or house of the wearer or status (e.g., prefect), or to show that the wearer has represented his or her school competitively (especially at sports). A different design is usually worn by Old Boys or Girls (alumni).

At the time of the Iranian Islamic Revolution, the Islamic fundamentalist hardliners of the revolution were called by the mainstream U.S. press "turbans", and the modernist moderates were called "neckties". Ties have been denounced in Iran as decadent, un-Islamic, and a symbol of the oppressive West. Since then, most Iranian men have worn long-sleeved shirts with collars but no ties.

Ties and associated health issues

The debate between proponents and opponents of the wearing of neckties generally centre on issues of conformity, expectation, and expression. Frank Lloyd Wright said of great architecture (himself quoting another great architect, Louis Sullivan, who was also his mentor), "Form follows function". Applied to fashion, the tie's function as decoration stands criticised by the same principle. Arizona State University recently passed a resolution (2005) to have no discrimination based upon gender preferences, including cross-gender choices. However, as it takes some time to change policies and sentiments, they retained a rule requiring all men to wear ties and all women to wear hose and heels in the Office of the President for any ambassadorship visits or official meetings. Some men have been turned down for employment and even fired with or without explanation after appearing without the "expected" tie. For women, on the other hand ties are considered used to classed as 'improper' but due to the sexism issue, more and more employers are forcing women to wear ties to create a unified dress code.

Opponents of necktie wearing have cited risks associated with the wearing of neckties as an argument for discontinuing the practice. These risks have primarily involved entanglement, infection, and vascular constriction. The risk of entanglement is generally well understood by people working around machinery or in situations where person-to-person confrontation may occur (e.g., police and prison personnel, and in certain medical fields). The answer is generally to avoid wearing ties, or use the clip-on variety which detach from the wearer when grabbed. The risk of cross-infection of patients by doctors wearing ties is being treated seriously by hospitals, it being noted that ties are cleaned less often than most items of clothing and can carry bacteria. Doctors routinely lean across patients and ties frequently come into contact with patients, therefore bow ties have traditionally been popular with doctors. The risk of vascular constriction, in cases where ties are worn with over-tight collars, has been noted. Studies have shown an increase in intra-ocular pressure in these cases which can worsen the condition of people with already weakened retinas. People with glaucoma should exercise special care. In all cases sensible precautions can mitigate these risks; the danger lies in lack of awareness of the risks. Paramedics performing basic life support remove the tie from a victim as one of the very first steps when a victim is unconscious or has difficulty breathing to ensure it does not compromise the airway.

Anti-tie sentiment

The removal of ties as a requirement (and in some cases, a forbidding of ties) is a modern trend attributed by historians to the rise of popular culture in the 1960s. While still fairly common as late as 1965, over the years 1966 and 1967, the necktie began to fall completely out of fashion nearly everywhere in everyday use, except where required. After a brief fashion resurgence in the 1980s, the 1990s saw Internet-based (or dot-com) companies, where many workers did not feel the need for fashion to appear in front of clients since appearances came from the websites rather than face-to-face meetings. There was also a sentiment of independence (a kind of general liberalism) and a new way of doing things. Large teams of sales-by-telephone salespeople were also increasing at this time, and many of the men and women were required to wear ties because of a perception that they improved attitudes, morale, and sales. Casual Fridays became a very popular tradition during this time, in which employees were not required to wear ties on Fridays, and then—increasingly—on other announced special days. Some employers extended casual days to Thursdays, and even Wednesdays, and still others required ties only on Mondays (to start out the week). Eric Crown, CEO of Insight Direct, which was beginning to see substantial sales via their website along with their over $1B a year in phone sales, announced one morning (1995) that none of its 800 male telephone salespeople would any longer be required to wear ties. After studying sales patterns for casual days, they made the announcement by having each tie cut in half with scissors by the receptionist as the employees made their way through the lobby and security-pass door.

Tie racks

Ties are popularly given as gifts and wearers often accumulate a large collection. While a man's selection of suit and shirt is somewhat restricted, he usually faces little difficulty in choosing a tie. Even a conservative dresser may entertain a dozen possibilities and these must be considered in light of the day's other clothing. This daily chore has given rise to the tie rack. These may be simple panels of pins or elaborate revolving, motorized, illuminated gadgets.

See also

• Tie bar
• Paisley design found on ties
• Claus von Amsberg and the "Declaration of the Tie"
• Tie press - A device used to combat creasing in ties without heat-related damage.
• History of Western fashion series

References

1. Fink, Thomas (November 5, 2001). The 85 Ways to Tie a Tie: the science and aesthetics of tie knots (1st Paperback edition ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins. ISBN 1-84115-568-3 LCCN 00-0 – 0--for original hardcover edition. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |origdate= ignored (|orig-date= suggested) (help)
2. Kuhn, W. (January). "Violence in the emergency department: Managing aggressive patients in a high-stress environment". POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE. 105 (1): 143–148. PMID 9924500. Retrieved 2006-06-08. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
3. Nurkin, Steven (2004). "Is the Clinicians' Necktie a Potential Fomite for Hospital Acquired Infections?". Paper presented at the 104th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology May 23–May 27 2004, New Orleans, Louisiana. pp. p. 204. {{cite conference}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
4. Teng, C (2003). "Effect of a tight necktie on intraocular pressure". British Journal of Ophthalmology. 87 (8): 946–948. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.8.946. Retrieved 2006-06-08. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

External links

• History
  • Academia cravatica
  • Necktie down the ages
  • The Straight Dope: What is, or was, the purpose of men's neckties?
• Tie care (including tying)
  • About tying, cleaning and buying a tie
  • Tying, buying, wearing and caring for a necktie
• Knot choice
  • Which tie knot to use when?
• Tying
  • Theory
    • Tie knots papers, book, and background at Thomas Fink's webpage
    • Tie knots and random walks: (85 ways to tie a tie)
  • How to (also see table below)
    • Comparing the Most Commonly Used Necktie Knots
  • Additional tips
    • How to tie a tie, by tie-a-tie.net Videos, and other tie-related information
    • How to Tie a Tie by eHow.com Has tips
    • Ties Understanding the different types of ties

External links: How to tie a tie

Note: the instructions in the following three links are often confusing and questionably accurate

Each page in the table below covers the four-in-hand knot (not to be confused with the four-in-hand tie, although they're usually used together), the Windsor, and the half-Windsor, so these knots are not included in the table.

• Types of clothing
• Neckties