Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jehochman (talk | contribs) at 02:54, 20 July 2019 (→Welcome back: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi there. You marked How to keeps brown recluse spiders away? as a candidate for speedy deletion - however as it is a copyvio there is a different way of handling them, see Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems. But anyway such clear cases like that one will probably get deleted after the 7 day grace period anyway. So keep on checking the new pages, we can need every help on that one. andy 17:13, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I'm aware it's a copyvio. I've marked several pages as copyvios in the past - however, I decided to mark this one as a speedy because the person who posted it included a few comments which seemed to me to attempt to imply that they had permission - so I decided to be safe and mark it as a speedy instead, due to the title. If you check the edit history, you'll see that the edit description mentioned that it was also a copyvio. In retrospect, it was a bad idea, but I did have my own twisted logic behind it. >:D Yelyos 17:32, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Hello again, Yelyos. Thank-you very much for your support on the requests for administration page. I know you offered me before, and I wasn't ready, so I apologize for not approaching you- but I felt that it might be better if I were nominated by somebody without a personal relationship- just to keep things as unbiased as possible. Of course, I'm not at all saying that you're a bias person, but people with personal relationships can sometimes have clouded views. I know I simply couldn't live with myself if I thought I was nominated just because I knew another Wikipedian! -] 22:36, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• hehe, yes. A very valid point, for sure. Congradulations on the nomination (and almost sure adminship, judging from the votes). Yelyos 23:20, Aug 29, 2004 (UTC)

Hello again. Thanks for your confidence (and your vote!). Unfortunately, I just realized that the number of contributions listed on requests for adminship page is wrong. I don't have 1,906 contributions. Instead, I have 1,492. If you want to change your vote, I understand, and I won't hold it against you. Either way- you have my appreciation :). I'll see you around! -] 23:31, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping an eye out

Just saw that you reverted a change to Mr. Hooper on August 19. Thanks for helping, the user you reverted made a ton of mess in various Sesame Street articles, I'm grateful you caught part of what he had done. -- user:zanimum

Thanks

Thanks for your support for my adminship, and for your very positive words. Jayjg 16:42, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the addition

Hi Yelyos. Thanks for the addition to the list of mnemonics page. That is a fun one indeed! Uranographer 11:10, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Glad you liked it - it's one that my piano teacher is fond of using. Yelyos 17:10, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)

RfA

BOO! I nominated you for adminship. Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Yelyos

You've to accept now, ok?

--Node 00:43, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for that. :-) Evercat 01:11, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my user page. Pouya 02:21, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Sonia Gandhi

Hi, What makes you think Sonia Maino was born Sonia Maino ? She was born as Antonia Maino. What did she do at Cambridge ? Steven claims she did not go to Cambridge University yet that's what Sonia( Antonia Maino ) has been claiming.

Why is opposition party referred to as "Hindu Nationalist"? I corrected it since wikipedia does not allow opinions. It allows "FACTS".

Sorry about the Antonio Maino thing, that was an error on my part. As for the Cambridge part, the link was to Cambridge, England, not Cambridge University, so I assumed he meant the city and not the university - in any case, disputes, comments, questions, etc. about an article are supposed to be settled on the talk page, and not the main article page. As for the Hindu Nationalists, I'm not entirely sure, but I'll leave that as something for those knowledgable on this subject to work out. My revert was primarily aimed at reverting what I saw as an injection of opinion into the article, and I believe I made some errors, and for that, I apologize. Yelyos 03:33, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Matthew Sellitto

Please don't add unverifiable information to articles. anthony 警告 20:41, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my wiki page. I think that user got a bit upset about me reverting his vandalism, heh. Cyrloc 02:28, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. (It looks like that particular vandal needs a bit more encouragement toward reforming.) -] 17:36, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Tessaiga

Hi. I have posted a request to revisit this topic at Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related_articles). Thanks. Your input will be appreciated. LG-犬夜叉 09:29, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

Dune (novel)

Hi. That tag you moved from the article to the talk page (notable citation). It's not supposed to be on the article page itself? Why? Kaisershatner 5 July 2005 17:39 (UTC)

If you have a look at Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Notable_citation, it'll show that in all of the cases where that template was used, it was on the talk page. Dune (novel) was the only exception to this, and so I moved it to the talk page. The reason for putting them all on the talk page is probably because it's the sort of template which would be more of interest to wikipedians (as it's a reference to the article itself, and not the subject of the article, and the usage of the template in general tells more about the pervasiveness of Misplaced Pages than it does about the articles it's placed on) than general readers, looking for information on Dune. It could be contrasted with something like, say, the NPOV dispute template, which cautions readers of the article to take what it says with a grain of salt. Yelyos July 5, 2005 19:48 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. Thanks.Kaisershatner 6 July 2005 13:55 (UTC)

templates

why do they even have that one?

Gabrielsimon 6 July 2005 18:21 (UTC)

An IP vandal seems to have created it. It should be deleted soon. Yelyos July 6, 2005 18:24 (UTC)

ahh, good.

a smarter vandal might make a page dedicated to saying mean things about bush instead of chanigng that one... o well :-) Gabrielsimon 6 July 2005 18:27 (UTC)

User:Humblefool

Thanks for rvting that vandalism of my userpage a few days ago. You were so fast I didn't even notice it until now! humblefool® 02:28, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

2002 election

Sorry about that. I attempted to correct the spelling and it all went haywire.

Lapsed Pacifist 00:16, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!

Have a cookie! android79 has presented you with this token of appreciation for: reverting vandalism on his user page.

I didn't even notice that until now! Thanks a bunch. android79 05:18, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! No problem. Yelyos 05:22, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Ted Harris

Heh. We both caught it at the same time.  :) Zoe 09:04, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I got an edit conflict with you on WP:CP, actually. Only difference was my four tildes and your signature. Yelyos 09:06, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Thank you for voting to support my RFA. I've been promoted, and I promise to wield the mop with good faith, patience, and fairness... except when I'm exterminating vandals with the M-16 recoilless nuclear Gatling mop. --malathion 08:06, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

In A.D. 2005

In A.D. 2005

Yoshi war was beginning.

Yellow Yoshi: What happen ?

Func: Somebody set up us the RFA.

...eh, I'm no good at this. You remain the master. :)

Yelyos, thank you very much for your vote on my adminship! :) I fully expect to see your name on RfA very soon...For great encyclopedia. :)

Please never hesitate to let me know if you have concerns with any administrative action I may make.

Func( t, c, e,  ) 03:49, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Frazzydee

Yelyos - since you're the one who passed me the message about Frazzydee not having internet access in the first place, do you have any idea when he's getting it restored? →Raul654 04:19, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Actually, he returned from his original trip, but I haven't been able to get in touch with him, as apparently he's gone off to Vancouver. Yelyos 04:48, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Category:Millennial Wikipedians

Category:Millennial Wikipedians has been listed on categories for deletion. Since you are using it on your user page please weigh in on the vote and that of the other generational categories here. Thanks. -JCarriker 20:50, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

*POKE*

Hey, there's a revert war with some users being dorks on User:Phroziac/Flammable refrigerants. I gotta go, if you could watch it while i'm gone, that would be great. :) --Phroziac 20:36, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

User Categorisation

You were listed on the Misplaced Pages:Wikipedians/Ontario page as living in or being associated with Ontario. As part of the Misplaced Pages:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Ontario for instructions.--Rmky87 04:50, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Blue screen of death/Red screen of death

Hello. The merge of articles is disputed. I much appreciate your opnion, thanks. --Mateusc 02:12, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

I noticed you commented at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Red screen of death. Could you come and comment at Talk:Blue screen of death#Foo Screen of Death merge? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:20, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Adminship

I have promoted you to adminship. Congradulations. Please familiarize yourself with the relavant policies before using those shiny new buttons. Raul654 01:57, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

New WikiProject

I've created the WikiProject on Article Verification we discussed on IRC a few days ago. It's still very much a rough draft, but with a few interested people we can get it off the ground. Interested? ;) // Pathoschild 21:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 04:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Phone call for you :)

Hello!

You're mom's having a bit of trouble getting in touch with her, and asked me to contact you through Misplaced Pages to tell you to call her.

See you later,

Frazzydee|✍ 00:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Toilets in Japan

Toilets in Japan is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy (Talk) 16:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

wikipedia policy and privacy

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#former_names_of_transsexual_people

maybe this would interest you. you can add your thoughts to the discussion there?--Sonjaaa 15:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Classification of admins

Hi Yelyos. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 23:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

For creation of the Ginban Kaleidoscope article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.54.93.104 (talk) 04:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:111USSenateStructure.png

File:111USSenateStructure.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:111USSenateStructure.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Misplaced Pages, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Misplaced Pages, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

FAR

I have nominated Toilets in Japan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Ig Nobel Prize winners

Category:Ig Nobel Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Yelyos. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Yelyos.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yelyos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yelyos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux 00:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Welcome back

I don't believe we've met before. I only started editing in 2005 and then became an admin in 2007, a relative newcomer compared to you. Jehochman 02:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)