This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Piotrus (talk | contribs) at 04:25, 19 March 2018 (→RE: Content related to topics on Poland: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:25, 19 March 2018 by Piotrus (talk | contribs) (→RE: Content related to topics on Poland: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Nice work
Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for all the recent work you've put into the Poland article. It's a good step in removing the issues that often plague Polish topics on Misplaced Pages. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Samotny Wędrowiec, many thanks! I figured a bit of grammar fixing was in order. :D --E-960 (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Response
Sorry for not responding earlier (re: this) - I'm glad you placed a discussion on each of the talk pages but the wording makes it seem as if you're suggesting it when in fact you already changed it. Still, the replacement maps are mostly as good if not better. The only one one where it really didn't improve the article was at Elbe Germanic peoples (this was reverted by Bermicourt), since the new map didn't contain any mention of Elbe Germanic and the original map was integral to the article. Since most of them are not contested I'd say it worked out. Prinsgezinde (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, E-960. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanctions Notification - Eastern Europe
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
RE: Content related to topics on Poland
Hi. I appreciate your interest in Polish related topics, through I don't recall you've ever participated in Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Poland. Do stop by some time. Anyway, I see you've been on en wiki since 2014. I've been here a bit longer. I'll just say that if you are becoming involved in Poland-related controversies, and you tell me that in my edits I am "overly focusing on the BAD and the UGLY about topics related to Poland", well. A lot of people would get a very good laugh about. Nie ucz ojca dzieci robic, kolego. Anyway, you are correct that some people had or have strong biases, including anti-Polish. But you have entered a minefield (did I just see a DS warning above?). Tread lightly, including what you write to whom. Assume good faith, be polite, but also realize that notability applies to things that can hurt one's national pride, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)