This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 193.140.214.67 (talk) at 06:15, 26 October 2006 (→Farabi). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:15, 26 October 2006 by 193.140.214.67 (talk) (→Farabi)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | User:ManiF is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Farabi
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:193.140.214.67&redirect=no
Hi you give me a warning. I am wondering if you have given same warning to Tajik? And why is my edit reverted then? Are you a Persian? Are you one of the Turkophobists?
I am going to revert and add Turkistan as birthplace to the article. Because it is from reliable source. So you have to deny Britannica and all the other historians with some scientific work.
Muchas gracias
Hey Mani, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, —Khoikhoi 05:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Composite images
Hi, are you certain that the components of those images are copyright? If so, they should be deleted -- I believe they would be considered derivative works and not acceptable with regards to copyright law/policy. If you can identify which image in each is still under copyright, I'll feel comfortable in removing them. Thanks. --Improv 14:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- That'll do. I've removed the images. Thanks for letting me know. --Improv 01:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Dialogue
I am open to discussion. As I said before, if verifiability must apply to the Arabs of Khuzestan article to the extent that views of some writers are excluded, then it must also apply to the Khazal Khan article, where I have removed an unsupported POV statement. Discuss this please. At least ensure consistency.--88.110.190.21 21:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)