Talk:LGBTQ rights opposition

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flame486 (talk | contribs) at 22:49, 19 May 2019 (→LGBT Doesn't only mean gay...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:49, 19 May 2019 by Flame486 (talk | contribs) (→LGBT Doesn't only mean gay...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGBTQ rights opposition article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 14 days

LGBTQ+ studies C‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Conservatism Unassessed

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please limit discussion on this page to proposed changes to the LGBT rights opposition article only. This is not the place for discussions about Misplaced Pages policies or guidelines. All discussion unrelated to the article will be removed.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

History section definitely biased

As many already know, this article is ridden with bias, but I've come to speak of the history section. Surely there was opposition of "LGBT rights" before Nazi Germany, and starting the history section speaking of Nazi Germany makes conservatives (like me) seem as if they are genocidal fascists themselves. This was already spoken of about two years ago on this very talk page, but it was never attended to. BTW, opposition to LGBT rights does not equate to opposition to LGBT people; it is not as an antisemite would hate Jews, not even close. TabletopRat (talk) 20:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

"Bigotry" use in article

I propose that the word "bigotry" be removed from this article. The arguments I made previously all still stand, as the issues I have raised were not dealt properly with. Lincean (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

I don't see that happening. See #RfC: Is using "bigotry" here express a point of view?. Please let it go. - Mr X 01:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

I don't think any of that addressed the issues that I raised. When something violates a Misplaced Pages policy, it needs to be addressed. Lincean (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

While consensus can change, I don't see, Lincean, that you're suggesting any change in the community's perspective might have occurred since the RFC less than a year ago, or that you might be able to sway the community's opinion with new arguments or evidence. You seem rather to be making a point of the fact that you have no new arguments or evidence. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on LGBT rights opposition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://glapn.org/sodomylaws/world/afghanistan/afnews007.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://glapn.org/sodomylaws/world/saudi_arabia/saudinews19.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051122112358/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/Ukpga_19880009_en_5.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/Ukpga_19880009_en_5.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130404235316/http://www.nsm88.org/25points/25pointsengl.html to http://www.nsm88.org/25points/25pointsengl.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Not motivations

The second paragraph notes that it may be motivated by "religion, moral beliefs, homophobia, transphobia, bigotry, animosity, political ideologies, or other reasons". But homophobia, transphobia and especially animosity aren't motivations for opposing it but rather ways said opposition may express itself in/contribute to. Someone doesn't oppose their rights because they're X-phobic, they oppose rights and they're X-phobic (because of another reason). Religion, moral beliefs, bigotry and political ideologies are all possible (as well as the "or other reasons"), but, while they are linked, the phobias and animosity aren't. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 11:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT rights opposition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights opposition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130112130516/http://www.bsalegal.org/support-our-scouts-act-of-2005-261.asp to http://www.bsalegal.org/support-our-scouts-act-of-2005-261.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

LGBT Doesn't only mean gay...

Hello. I was reading your article, and I just have to say that a majority of the "LGBT rights opposition" only includes countries' and groups views on homosexuality in general. That's great to talk about when it comes to the "G" in "LGBT", but I've yet to find much to talk about transgender rights opposition, or the entire group in general. Flame486 (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Categories: