This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Greier (talk | contribs) at 12:09, 28 November 2006 (→Edit warring). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:09, 28 November 2006 by Greier (talk | contribs) (→Edit warring)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)/archive 1 27 august - 17 november 2006
Tiraspol Times
I think you misunderstand William there: The letter and my post he quoted state that the newspaper is indeed available at certain places, but it's not for sale (evaluation copies, I guess). The guys I asked said that they didn't see it available for sale in public. I say, let's wait for Mark's reply/reaction to my proposal before jumping to conclusions. --Illythr 21:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Why you didn't ask your friends to check directly on the places indicated in the e-mail you received? Anyhow Mauco misquoted you, jumping at the conclusion that hard copy existence of Tiraspol Times is an established fact beyond question, using your name as a proof.--MariusM 21:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- I replied to you over there.
- The letter states that TT does indeed exist in printed copies. Just not everywhere and not for sale yet. I think it's that English word "available" that may be (and probably was) interpreted in several ways. --Illythr 21:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Proper place for this discussion - Talk:Transnistria.--MariusM 09:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for edit warring with User:William Mauco over several articles. -- Steel 16:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Way
ahead of you. Check the talk page :) - Francis Tyers · 23:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Edit warring
Hi Marius,
Thanks for your note. I appreciate the time it took you to write it. I will look into the situation tomorrow, but it is too late here to do anything effective tonight. I would ask that you refrain from making major edits on those articles until this mess can be unravelled. Please do not bother reverting Mauco's additions, as whatever the problem is, quickly reverting it won't solve the problem. I promise to look into the situation more tomorrow, and thanks again for your note. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 04:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Da, sunt de acord. Drept sa-ti zic, nu stiam nici eu sa fi existat asa ceva. Dar el cum e insistent, tot zicea ca a citit el ca o republica a fost declarata pentru cateva zile la Odesa. Oricum, daca vei propune stergerea, eu te sustin. Dapiks 06:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Please contibute
to Transnistria#Propaganda_and_disinformation. Let`s add all those links to The Economist, Ziua, etc. Let`s turn this campaign against them. Mauco is gonna loose his job, Mauco is gonna loose his job, Mauco is gonna loose his job... hahah haha Greier 12:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)