This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ret.Prof (talk | contribs) at 14:54, 3 November 2019 (Arhive). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:54, 3 November 2019 by Ret.Prof (talk | contribs) (Arhive)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Archive 12 (2019)
Please Leave comments below
Hello! c: --NikkeKatski (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, you played a role in my "Keep" - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oh cool. I see that it kinda does go against some rules but im hoping we could keep it and maybe revamp it. Im kinda going along with the idea of 'WP:Ignore all rules'. I really think it could be a good addition if done right. --NikkeKatski (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oh cool. I see that it kinda does go against some rules but im hoping we could keep it and maybe revamp it. Im kinda going along with the idea of 'WP:Ignore all rules'. I really think it could be a good addition if done right. --NikkeKatski (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom: Disputes at SNC-Lavalin affair
I thought you may want to know that Curly Turkey has started an ArbCom request here an extension of the ANI. I will comment there when I have time, but I wanted to make sure you are aware as Curly has not notified all parties.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 02:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)