Misplaced Pages

User talk:Philwelch

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Philwelch (talk | contribs) at 21:10, 11 December 2006 (→Rush). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:10, 11 December 2006 by Philwelch (talk | contribs) (→Rush)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Look at page history for archives. I used to keep archive pages until I realized it was stupid to do by hand what Misplaced Pages does automatically.

About Making Everybody Gay Icons

I really don't understand your reasons for making all these singers as what you call them "gay icons". You have included such artists as Billie Holiday, Patsy Cline and Ella Fitzgerald. Me, as much of a fan as I am of these singers (especially Patsy Cline), can not understand why you think they could be gay icons. I have studied the ins and outs of Patsy Cline and nowhere has it been said that she was a gay icon. It seems you have no information to back up what you're saying about these legandary singers. I am curious to know how these singers became gay icons, and why you think they've come so close to becoming gay icons. Please respond back to me as soon as you read this message. I would like to know about this. -- LovePatsyCline 23:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

That was years ago, I've undone most of them, and all I was doing was transferring a list over to a category. If you can't find any sources, feel free to remove them from the category. Philwelch 05:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Rush

What are you doing to the Rush pages? Please revert your edits, which border on vandalism. If you think there's a problem with these pages, please bring it up on the talk pages. Rush was a main page featured article, and thus has achieved a certain level of wuality as a page. Discussion is preferred to the rapid removal of large quantities of information. ThuranX 21:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't have to explain myself. Rush is an encyclopedia—if a page is not an encyclopedia article, it doesn't belong here. Philwelch 21:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)