Misplaced Pages

User talk:Embargo

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Embargo (talk | contribs) at 19:24, 12 December 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:24, 12 December 2006 by Embargo (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

You user page

I've just removed the content from your userpage as per What can I not have on my user page?. Please do not reinsert it again. Cheers -- Szvest 15:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not fight against wikipedia rules. -- Szvest 16:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Note that i've been acting gently with you. Please also note that i am an admin and you are not entitled to have provocative content on your userpage as per What can I not have on my user page?. Please behave and this would be your last warning. -- Szvest 19:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for 24h for because of the persistent insertion of provocative material on your userpage. Please refrain from doing so when coming back. -- Szvest 19:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Embargo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Maimonides had no right to block. First because the material I had on the userpage was taken from an article in wp and what was written was quoted. Secondly, the admin told me this will be your last warning (and was the second only) and blocked me before I did anything (check time of warning and my last edit). Tell the administrator who blocked me to keep his religion and halakha at the door, without having it interfering with other people's edits.

Decline reason:

What is acceptable in articles and userspace can be completley different things, our aim is to write an neutral point of view encyclopedia as a collabrative effort, that means that we acknowldege all significant points of view in articles, however such expressions in userspace maybe divise and utlitmately to the detriment of thw encyclopedia. I will raise the timing issue with the blocking admin, but hope you can accept that our own POV should ultimately be immaterial in our neutral writing --pgk 22:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Timing

It may be true that my action was quick. It may be true that i was so lean with you as i explained to you the rules. But it is also true that i am the only one who still thinks you can get a second chance here. Have a look at other admins' comments who would support an indef ban. So let's see it chronologically again:

Again, i m still waiting to see you contributing here abiding by the rules. Otherwise, i'd surely follow the recommendations of the other admins at the noticeboard above. -- Szvest 11:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Embargo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Shouldn't my block be expired by now? The 24 hours have passed.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Shouldn't my block be expired by now? The 24 hours have passed. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Shouldn't my block be expired by now? The 24 hours have passed. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Shouldn't my block be expired by now? The 24 hours have passed. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: