This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 12:54, 17 February 2021 (Signing comment by Jdn1899 - "→what is the purpose of the section on "American exceptionalism"?: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:54, 17 February 2021 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by Jdn1899 - "→what is the purpose of the section on "American exceptionalism"?: new section")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American imperialism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about American imperialism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about American imperialism at the Reference desk. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American imperialism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Gone too far
The American Imperialism page has actually gone too far in one direction. Whilst this talk page was initially created to speak regarding the softness of the article regarding the topic, the entire article has been revamped in the opposite direction. Thus, it is still not a neutral article. In most other professional and encyclopedic versions of articles I have read on Misplaced Pages, historians are cited occasionally to give a point of view, but in this article it is so cluttered with negative historical views of America's foreign policy, you miss out on the actual informative things. A standard middle school textbook does a better job than the current article, which desperately needs to be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.7.66.150 (talk • contribs) 22:41, November 26, 2016 (UTC)
China's use of 'American hegemonism'
I know from memory that a few decades ago China used to refer to (and condemn) 'American hegemonism', and perhaps it still does. It might be useful to mention this in the section that discusses American hegemony, if anybody can find reliable sources to support it. Tlhslobus (talk) 07:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
POV lead
This edit caught my eye -- particularly the restored wording which, at a glance, appears to be editorial POV. I don't have time right not to look closely at this, but I see that this has undergone changes recently -- the furthest I have looked back is the substantially different wording back in this version as of a couple of weeks ago. The cited supporting source requires a subscription for access. I'll try to find time to look more closely at this later if nobody else has fixed it by the time I get back to it. Please discuss below as needed. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- I happened to look back at this, and I notice that I began it with a bad link. I don't recall making the edit but, AFAICT, the initial link should go to this version of the article. I see that this was changed in the next edit with this edit having an edit summary saying "conforming to source." Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Characterization of Thomas Jefferson in the article
This edit caught my eye. I don't have an issue with the edit but, as often happens, it got me thinking about the surrounding content. In this case, quoting from the article:
Thomas Jefferson, in the 1790s, awaited the fall of the Spanish Empire "until our population can be sufficiently advanced to gain it from them piece by piece"which is supported there by two cited sources.
This, in an article on the topic of American Imperialism, seems to me to characterize Jefferson as an imperialist -- perhaps as a warmongering imperialist.
I'm not a historian and, even if I were, my thoughts about whether or not Jefferson was an imperialist would be WP:POV -- a cite of a verifiable and reliable source unambiguously supporting such a characterization would be required. The two supporting sources cited might be taken as doing that. If they are, though, WP:DUE says that other viewpoints supported by similarly solid sources should also be presented.
One source which I came across in googling abut this is The National Magazine; A Monthly Journal of American History. 1887. p. 355. Quoting from that source:
Spain was early and long jealous of English extension into the southwest, and, though she reluctantly agreed, in the treaty of 1783, to the latitude of thirty-one on the Mississippi as the dividing line between the United States and herself, she sought to make void the treaty by still claiming up to thirty-two degrees and twenty-eight minutes. Our ardent pioneers pressed so vigorously into this disputed "Natchez country," that Jefferson was moved, in 1786, to words of caution:We should take care not to for the interest of that great continent to press too soon upon the Spaniards. Those countries cannot be in better hands. My fear is that they are too feeble to hold them until our population can be sufficiently advanced to gain it from them piece by piece*
- 'AM. State Papers,' Boston Ed., Vol V., 94-
The emphasis there is mine -- intended to highlight the words requoted in the article to cast Jefferson as an imperialist. Again, I'm not a historian, but it seems to me that this other source from which I've quoted above does not characteriza Jefferson as an imperialist -- quite the contrary, rather.
The question of whether or not Jefferson can properly be characterized as an imperialist would be, I think, too small a point in regard to the topic of this article to introduce a dispute about that here -- perhaps an article about Jefferson himself might be a fit place for that. Here, though, it seems to me that this other source introduces sufficient doubt about that to make it improper to characterize Jefferson as an imperialist here.
I therefore propose that this bit be removed from the article.
Discussion? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
I've tweaked the article re Jefferson here. I'm no historian; better informaed editors may want to take a second look at this. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 20:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Wrong title
I search "British Empire", I do not get redirected to "British Imperialism."
I search "American Empire", I get redirected to "American Imperialism".
This manifests an absurd bias, and should be changed.
BrianMDelaney (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- The U.S. never had a formal empire, but has acted in imperialistic ways. --Roastedturkey (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- If you feel a change is needed, that could be discussed at Talk:American empire or the redirect could be listed at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
There is no such thing as the American empire and never had been. This page is an absurdity. You can't say "it acted imperialistically" and then jump to the conclusion "it WAS imperial!" Gd123lbp (talk) 03:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Page name change
The term "imperialism" is given it's own new definition at the start of this page. It is not imperialism in the traditional sense. Therefore I think a more appropriate name is needed. Clearly we are talking about an incidious form of cultural influence permeating from the nation of the USA.
I suggest a better name would be: American globalisation or Global influence of the USA Gd123lbp (talk) 03:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- So, you want to change the name of the article because the text doesn't reflect it properly? That's a reason to edit the text, not to change the name to something else which the Text also doesn't adequately reflect.Mdw0 (talk) 05:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I am not suggesting an alternative to the text, I am suggesting an alternative title based on that text. For example if you needed to describe an orange in an article but titled the article "apple" would you change the title to orange or edit the entire article to fit the title? Gd123lbp (talk) 01:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- When an article strays off course somewhat, the solution isn't to double down on it and just change the article's topic and title with it. "Imperialism" and "imperialist" occur 99 times in the article, and are discussed in depth. Perhaps if you mentioned and related to apples 99 times while discussing an orange, your article should indeed be titled "apple". Prinsgezinde (talk) 23:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
what is the purpose of the section on "American exceptionalism"?
There seem to be no direct links to the topic of this article, which is imperialism. Also, the notion of exceptionalism was throughout U.S. history used to justify both imperialism and opposition to imperialism. It is also a very short and incoherent section. Could this be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdn1899 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- C-Class International relations articles
- High-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class United States History articles
- High-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Misplaced Pages articles that use American English