Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dallavid

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dallavid (talk | contribs) at 17:15, 25 March 2021 (Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:15, 25 March 2021 by Dallavid (talk | contribs) (Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Dallavid, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Dallavid! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia. Thanks! ~ Ase1estecharge-parity 10:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:UAVs Made In Armenia. Thanks! ~ Ase1estecharge-parity 15:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UAVs Made In Armenia (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Since anyone can edit Misplaced Pages, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you. The comment the reviewer left was: This should be merged into the List of unmanned aerial vehicles where there is a section on Armenia. There are longer lists of UAVs from other countries and those haven't had to split off from this list yet. You can also start a split discussion there. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Right To Struggle

Notice

The article The Right To Struggle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Current Version + WP:BEFORE does not give me any result which could establish sufficient notability per WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

I blocked your account from editing User talk:CuriousGolden for a week. Please consider this as a last warning. I do not see so many useful contribution from your account, and this talk page is full of warning, but I do see some harassment. If you want to continue editing Misplaced Pages please stop doing what you are doing now and start contributing constructively.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Could you explain to me why? In what way have I harassed? A month ago I said something I regret writing but in the Regarding Hayanist subtopic I said nothing that can be classified as harassment, no? Could you justify your decision? @Ymblanter:
Your general tone on that page is really disgusting, and, in addition, you continue posting there even after you were asked to stop.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
What do you mean by my tone is really disgusting? Could you give an example? Perhaps I was pressing since CuriousGolden didn't respond to what I answered to him. For example he claimed x, I refute what he says then he changes the topic. Regarding "in addition, you were asked to stop", the only reason I was on his talk page was because he was constantly undoing my edits and previously he had threatened to block in case other people continued to undo him undoing edits. He could've messaged me on my talk page after I undid him undoing my edits (if that makes sense), there wouldn't have been a difference. By the way, I have a question, is the tone I am using now really disgusting? @Ymblanter:
Look, - is he under obligation to reply to your messages at his talk page? How come that a removal of a reliable source can be justified in this way? How is this not shouting? How is pinging a user every time posting on his talk page constructive?--Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your first point, it turned out that one of the sources he listed didn't even exist so I rightfully removed it, and the other two were alleged quotes from a book that he could've at least posted a link to like he did with the "Rediscovering Armenia" book. Regarding second point, he was undoing my edit and I was restoring them so before he threatened to block me for edit warring (which I should add that he did earlier to other people, I can post a link if you don't believe me), I decided to continue the dispute on his talk page. Regarding me shouting, I didn't mean it in a rude way, which I even stated in a previous comment. I simply was tired of refuting his claims just for him to change the subject so I capitalized on my last point. Regarding pinging a user, isn't that how it sends someone a notification? When he replied he never pinged me so I had to frequently check his talk page in order to see if he had responded. Now that I've answered your questions, I'd like to ask why you blocked me for something I said 1 month ago that wasn't even relevant to the (then) current dispute? I'd like to ask why, when I pinged you to resolve this dispute since he didn't reply to any of my points and changed the subject, you didn't respond for two days however when Curious complained to you, you responded relatively quickly and blocked me? In his talk page I wrote and linked to his blatant pro-Azerbaijani bias several times which wasn't at all objective, and assuming you read the dispute on his talk page, this would've mean more than enough of a reason to warn/block him. However instead, you chose to block me for something I said a month ago? @Ymblanter: