Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Axlq (talk | contribs) at 19:32, 20 January 2007 (→Three-revert rule: fixed wikilink). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!Last edited: Last edited by:19:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC) Axlq (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your IP address, 193.219.28.146, is registered to Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. --Irishpunktom\ 23:01, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 14:30, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Lack of Balance

I intend to add sections to this page concerning the history of this organisation, it's current operations, the view of many observers that it operates as a cult and the reports of former members on the effects on their mental and spiritual health. Any attempt to change this page results in reversion and a claim of vandalism (although I was successful in getting you to remove copyright claims). My aim is a balanced view so to that end I have contacted former members who may also wish to improve the content.

If after the previous edit war you attempt to exert further editorial control I will ask for arbitration. I believe I am working within the policies and the spirit of Misplaced Pages and I strongly believe that you are not.

I suggest you take the opportunity to discuss.

Regards, Paul

--panpaniscus

Imbalance in GGWO

After reading through the article, and the links provided, I have reverted the article back to a balanced version. The edits you are inserting make it sound like an advertisement, and do not reflect any critisicism which the church/organisation has received. Please don't remove references to cults, or blindly revert. I've also noted that some comments say that your version 'is the version approved by the GGWO'. The GGWO has absolutely no say in Misplaced Pages articles. Any further blind reverts will be considered as vandalism. Consider this a first-level warning. Thankyou. HawkerTyphoon 10:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Please don't remove material detrimental to the GGWO. Thanks. HawkerTyphoon 18:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove this information contrary to Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, you will be blocked. Also note that removing messages and warning from yor talk page is considered vandalism. By all means edi the article, but do not remove negative comments about the organisation. HawkerTyphoon 18:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove content from a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. HawkerTyphoon 18:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Edit warring

Hello, please refrain from edit warring and from making inflammatory edit summaries as you are doing at Holodomor. Misplaced Pages adheres to a strict NPOV policy. Please discuss on the articles talk page if you disagree. Additionally, please refrain from making prejudicial comments based on the nationality of your fellow editors. Thank you. TheQuandry 18:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

NPOV tag

You have not given adequate reasons as to why the Mozilla Firefox article is POV. Stating that information about one subject is missing does not make the article POV. Please respond to my comments on the page. Also, please read our policies and guidelines on reliable sources and verifiability (linked on the talk page) as these will help clear up some of this.-Localzuk 19:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

193.219.28.146 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

193.219.28.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Vernyhora". The reason given for Vernyhora's block is: "3RR vio. Repeat offense.".

• Blocking administrator: CSTAR (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Please wait for the autoblock on the IP to expire, thanks. -- WinHunter 02:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Criticism on Firefox article

What do you mean by 'here is no real criticism in the article, it is removed in no-time'? There is copious amounts of criticism in the article. Anything that is unsourced, POV, poorly sourced or original research is removed quickly as you will see from the history and the hours of discussion on the talk page. If you believe there are other criticisms that should be added, please do so but ensure you comply with all our policies. Just stating 'we need more criticism' is pointless because unless there are external, reliable, sources making such criticisms it is just a request that will sit there with no end to it. I will remove it as I have not seen any suggestions for criticism being put forward which have been accompanied by reliable sources and written in a NPOV way. Please re-add it if you do think there are criticisms. Just a simple list of them would help - even if you can't find sources, it will help us find sources. Thanks -Localzuk 23:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, I think the privacy policy item is important to include and will look at including it.

However, I think the historic calling of it as 'the best browser' is slightly more important to the article than a security issue from a version long ago as it is indicative of how the product was received by the world whereas a security issue from a long time ago is only a security issue.

The problem on the talk page is that the arguments have become so cyclical and repetitive that it seems we have all lost sight of the purpose of the article.

We now have a section dedicated to google and their relationship, what is missing from it with regards to the anti-phishing feature?-Localzuk 23:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Removal of graphs

Please stop your editing in a disruptive manner. There has been discussion on the issue of the graphs and you are simply now ignoring it in order to push your own POV. The information is being presented, in the cumulative graph, in a sensible way. What is wrong with this?-Localzuk 23:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Three-revert rule

I should warn you you're also in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please refrain from edit wars. Could you instead discuss your proposed changes first if you think they may be controversial? Thanks. -- Schapel 02:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Talk:Ass to mouth. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. =Axlq

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. (WHOIS  Geolocate  Proxy Checker Current blocks XTools Global contributions) (RIRs: Africa America Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America/Caribbean)