This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Muchness (talk | contribs) at 17:51, 20 January 2007 (replaceable image notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:51, 20 January 2007 by Muchness (talk | contribs) (replaceable image notice)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 16 days are automatically archived to User talk:Hamedog/Archive 2. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Note:If you post a message here, I will reply here. If I post a message on your talk page, don't reply here. I have your page in my watchlist. This keeps the conversation from breaking.
Archives |
|
Jellybeans
Here are some Jelly beans for you. I love jelly beans as they have sugar in them and most people love sugar. But on the other hand just receiving somthing from somone else just makes you happy and also just giving this to you makes me happy. I hope to spread the jelly beans all over Misplaced Pages, so here, you can have this lot. Please enjoy them. (I like the lime ones.)
Editors need a bit of a sugar high too.
An apple a day keeps -The Doctor- away. Or does it! 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Aquinas
Thanks for ur comments on the AC article, thanks =) Smbarnzy 13:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- In reply to ur comments (which i do appreciate alot, thanks).
- I think it would be a bit wierd to have larger than one paragraph sections because we have main articles on all of those sections and they explain the topic in general and user:gnangarra said the small section should be a generalised statement.
- I chopped down the school song to the shortened 3 verse version - should it just go?
- Do you mean the lists on the daughter pages? Im proposing Academic studies for deletion - which i think is the major problem. Were there any other major listings.
- Canning river image used once now.
- Images have been added, any others that i can do myself?
- Anything else you see wrong with the article? Thanks =) Smbarnzy 16:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Hame man,
- can you take another look at the Aquinas College, Perth article for me and give me some more advise, please. I am lacking direction as to where to go from here. Thanks man Smbarnzy 12:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input on the PSA debate - much appreciated. Smbarnzy 14:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Rugby union peer review
Hey, you might want to have a look at this. Shudda 06:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
Ohh! Thanks a lot for the recognition. CeeGee 08:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
DYK
Did you know? was updated. On 9 January, 2007, a fact from the article Alejandro Maclean, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Yomangani 12:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
David Beckham
David Beckham L.A. Galaxy contract
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article David Beckham L.A. Galaxy contract, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.\
Also, just a heads up, also, you're using incorrect information (please note the correct information has been linked in the article already, he only will make about $10 million a year in direct salary, the rest is through endorsements in product sharing.) SirFozzie 23:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, I will work on the contract page (I still think it should be on the main Beckham article, but I can work with you :) SirFozzie 23:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have replied on my talk page. — Nearly Headless Nick 10:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
RBARWS
Thank you. I have also no idea when the race calendar will be announced. However, be assured, I will update the 2007 season page as soon as related news come out. Cheers. CeeGee 19:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Super 14 peer review
Hi, I was wondering if you could comment on the Super 14 page at it's peer review here. I would really appreciate the input. Thanks. - Shudda 22:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Chocolate
Hi, do you like whittakers chocolae?
AfD Nomination: David Beckham move to Los Angeles Galaxy
An editor has nominated the article David Beckham move to Los Angeles Galaxy for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Misplaced Pages is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Beckham move to Los Angeles Galaxy. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article David Beckham move to Los Angeles Galaxy during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 15:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:CaseyLaulalaMugShot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CaseyLaulalaMugShot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Muchness 17:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)